TY - GEN
T1 - Sealing capacity of caprocks for CO2 and H2 storage in Illinois Basin
AU - Kim, H.
AU - Makhnenko, R. Y.
N1 - H.K and R.M. acknowledge the support from US DOE through Illinois Storage Corridor DE-FE0031892.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Permanent geological carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is a promising pathway to mitigate the greenhouse gas levels. Recently, seasonal underground storage of hydrogen (H2) has become of interest to fulfill energy demand uninterruptedly by periodic renewable energy supply. Caprock formations should be studied for both types of the storage to inhibit the leakage of buoyancy-driven CO2 and H2. Cores of two caprock representatives - Eau Claire and Maquoketa groups - are collected from CO2 storage sites in Illinois Basin and tested for the breakthrough pressure with liquid CO2. The direct method is time-consuming due to the necessity of achieving full saturation and stepwise injection, such that the indirect method is often utilized to estimate the breakthrough pressure via the capillary pressure-saturation curve. The comparison between the two methods indicates that the direct method provides a higher value of the breakthrough pressure. The H2 breakthrough pressure of a given caprock is estimated by the indirect method to be approximately 2.4 times higher than that of CO2. However, we expect that the H2 breakthrough in very tight rock, like Maquoketa Shale, would occur through different leakage scenarios compared to CO2 breakthrough, suggesting that direct measurements under representative in-situ conditions should be conducted.
AB - Permanent geological carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is a promising pathway to mitigate the greenhouse gas levels. Recently, seasonal underground storage of hydrogen (H2) has become of interest to fulfill energy demand uninterruptedly by periodic renewable energy supply. Caprock formations should be studied for both types of the storage to inhibit the leakage of buoyancy-driven CO2 and H2. Cores of two caprock representatives - Eau Claire and Maquoketa groups - are collected from CO2 storage sites in Illinois Basin and tested for the breakthrough pressure with liquid CO2. The direct method is time-consuming due to the necessity of achieving full saturation and stepwise injection, such that the indirect method is often utilized to estimate the breakthrough pressure via the capillary pressure-saturation curve. The comparison between the two methods indicates that the direct method provides a higher value of the breakthrough pressure. The H2 breakthrough pressure of a given caprock is estimated by the indirect method to be approximately 2.4 times higher than that of CO2. However, we expect that the H2 breakthrough in very tight rock, like Maquoketa Shale, would occur through different leakage scenarios compared to CO2 breakthrough, suggesting that direct measurements under representative in-situ conditions should be conducted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177619506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177619506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.56952/ARMA-2023-0770
DO - 10.56952/ARMA-2023-0770
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85177619506
T3 - 57th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
BT - 57th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
PB - American Rock Mechanics Association (ARMA)
T2 - 57th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
Y2 - 25 June 2023 through 28 June 2023
ER -