Science, economics and the design of agricultural conservation programmes in the US

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Conservation programmes in the US have emphasised retirement of land from crop production as a mechanism for achieving multiple environmental benefits. Several features of these programmes, such as their eligibility criteria, participation incentives and length of contract, influence the performance of these programmes and their ease of implementation. The design of these programmes has evolved over time in an effort to increase environmental benefits while lowering costs. This paper reviews the key features of land retirement programmes in the US and their implications for programme effectiveness. In particular, it examines the potential benefits from spatial targeting of programme participants, linking contract length to the ecological services being targeted and relying more on science-based models for improving programme outcomes. Targeted land management focuses conservation practices on those portions of the landscape where they will achieve the greatest gains in environmental quality using limited programme budgets. The scientific basis for targeting conservation efforts is improving through better understanding of ecological and hydrological processes; however, better guidelines need to be developed to incorporate this understanding in developing decision support tools that local programme administrators can use effectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-592
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Keywords

  • Contract length
  • Iincentives
  • Land retirement
  • Spatial targeting
  • Water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science, economics and the design of agricultural conservation programmes in the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this