TY - JOUR
T1 - Satiation differentially affects performance in a learning assay by nurse and forager honey bees
AU - Ben-Shahar, Yehuda
AU - Robinson, Gene E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank A. Ross for invaluable technical assistance, and M. Giurfa, S.N. Beshers, G. Bloch, M.M. Eleko-nich, D.J. Schulz, C.W. Whitfield, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from the NIH to G.E.R. All experim ents described in this paper were done in compliance with the current laws of the United States.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - When not satiated prior to training, there were no differences between foragers and nurse honey bees in the acquisition of an appetitively based conditioned response in an olfactory associative learning assay, but when satiated foragers showed faster acquisition than did nurses. Satiation-related differences between foragers and nurses were more a function of behavioral state than age, because satiated precocious foragers also showed faster acquisition rates than did satiated nurse bees, despite their similar ages. Tests of sucrose responsiveness and retention of conditioned responses indicate that the observed performance differences between nurses and foragers were more likely due to differential sensitivity of sensory and motor processes related to satiation rather than differences in cognitive ability.
AB - When not satiated prior to training, there were no differences between foragers and nurse honey bees in the acquisition of an appetitively based conditioned response in an olfactory associative learning assay, but when satiated foragers showed faster acquisition than did nurses. Satiation-related differences between foragers and nurses were more a function of behavioral state than age, because satiated precocious foragers also showed faster acquisition rates than did satiated nurse bees, despite their similar ages. Tests of sucrose responsiveness and retention of conditioned responses indicate that the observed performance differences between nurses and foragers were more likely due to differential sensitivity of sensory and motor processes related to satiation rather than differences in cognitive ability.
KW - Apis mellifera
KW - Associative learning Division of labor
KW - Hymenoptera
KW - Proboscis extension reflex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035544588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035544588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00359-001-0260-z
DO - 10.1007/s00359-001-0260-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 11866187
AN - SCOPUS:0035544588
SN - 0340-7594
VL - 187
SP - 891
EP - 899
JO - Journal of Comparative Physiology - A Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
JF - Journal of Comparative Physiology - A Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
IS - 11
ER -