Abstract
In much of rural Africa, high transaction costs limit farmers' market participation and thus their potential for income growth. Transaction costs can affect not only whether a farmer sells product but also whether sales occur at the farm gate or at a market. If production behavior is related to a chosen sales location, then analysis of interventions can be improved by explicit consideration of the decision of where to sell. This article develops a double-selection model that explains consumption and production decisions by semi-subsistence farmers who first decide whether to be a seller and then whether to sell at the farm gate or at an off-farm location before deciding on production and consumption. The study tests the validity of this dual-criteria model against a single-criterion model in which a grower first decides to be a seller and then decides production, consumption, and sales location simultaneously. The results suggest that the dual-criteria model provides more information than the single-criterion model using a sample of cassava producer in Benin.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 655-670 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom) |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2012 |
Keywords
- Agricultural supply response
- Cassava, Benin
- Dual-criteria
- Sales location
- Transaction costs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Economics and Econometrics