Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize

Jason W. Haegele, Ryan J. Becker, Adam S. Henninger, Frederick E. Below

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Inter-plant competition must be carefully managed to realize the yield potential of increased plant density of maize (Zea mays L.). Twin row planting arrangement, P fertility, and hybrid selection may be important components of managing increased plant density. Our hypotheses were (i) that twin row planting arrangement would be superior to traditional 0.76-m rows at ultra-high densities and (ii) that supplemental P fertility would alleviate inter-plant competition. In 2010 and 2011, twin row planting arrangement was compared to single 0.76-m rows across densities ranging from 61,775 to 160,615 plants ha–1 and P fertility treatments ranging from 0 to 168 kg P2O5 ha–1. Twin rows did not increase yield relative to single rows, and twin rows often yielded significantly less at plant densities greater than 111,195 plants ha–1. Mean responses to supplemental fertility were 1.0 and 0.3 Mg ha–1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. There was no interaction between plant density and P fertility suggesting that extra resource availability does not necessarily overcome inter-plant competition. In 2011, two hybrids of contrasting ear type were included to explore the role of hybrid selection in plant density response. Maximum yields of each hybrid were achieved at contrasting densities, and genetic differences in plant density tolerance appeared to be related to (i) kernel number response on a per-area basis and (ii) stability of individual kernel weight. These results highlight the importance of independently optimizing row spacing and soil fertility while understanding the plant density response characteristics of maize hybrids.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1838-1846
Number of pages9
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume106
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

plant density
soil fertility
phosphorus
corn
plant competition
planting
row spacing
seeds
ears
Zea mays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize. / Haegele, Jason W.; Becker, Ryan J.; Henninger, Adam S.; Below, Frederick E.

In: Agronomy Journal, Vol. 106, No. 5, 01.09.2014, p. 1838-1846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haegele, Jason W. ; Becker, Ryan J. ; Henninger, Adam S. ; Below, Frederick E. / Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize. In: Agronomy Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 106, No. 5. pp. 1838-1846.
@article{4f1a7f5581bb4ee8a343162600e51001,
title = "Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize",
abstract = "Inter-plant competition must be carefully managed to realize the yield potential of increased plant density of maize (Zea mays L.). Twin row planting arrangement, P fertility, and hybrid selection may be important components of managing increased plant density. Our hypotheses were (i) that twin row planting arrangement would be superior to traditional 0.76-m rows at ultra-high densities and (ii) that supplemental P fertility would alleviate inter-plant competition. In 2010 and 2011, twin row planting arrangement was compared to single 0.76-m rows across densities ranging from 61,775 to 160,615 plants ha–1 and P fertility treatments ranging from 0 to 168 kg P2O5 ha–1. Twin rows did not increase yield relative to single rows, and twin rows often yielded significantly less at plant densities greater than 111,195 plants ha–1. Mean responses to supplemental fertility were 1.0 and 0.3 Mg ha–1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. There was no interaction between plant density and P fertility suggesting that extra resource availability does not necessarily overcome inter-plant competition. In 2011, two hybrids of contrasting ear type were included to explore the role of hybrid selection in plant density response. Maximum yields of each hybrid were achieved at contrasting densities, and genetic differences in plant density tolerance appeared to be related to (i) kernel number response on a per-area basis and (ii) stability of individual kernel weight. These results highlight the importance of independently optimizing row spacing and soil fertility while understanding the plant density response characteristics of maize hybrids.",
author = "Haegele, {Jason W.} and Becker, {Ryan J.} and Henninger, {Adam S.} and Below, {Frederick E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2134/agronj2013.0382",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1838--1846",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
issn = "0002-1962",
publisher = "American Society of Agronomy",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize

AU - Haegele, Jason W.

AU - Becker, Ryan J.

AU - Henninger, Adam S.

AU - Below, Frederick E.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Inter-plant competition must be carefully managed to realize the yield potential of increased plant density of maize (Zea mays L.). Twin row planting arrangement, P fertility, and hybrid selection may be important components of managing increased plant density. Our hypotheses were (i) that twin row planting arrangement would be superior to traditional 0.76-m rows at ultra-high densities and (ii) that supplemental P fertility would alleviate inter-plant competition. In 2010 and 2011, twin row planting arrangement was compared to single 0.76-m rows across densities ranging from 61,775 to 160,615 plants ha–1 and P fertility treatments ranging from 0 to 168 kg P2O5 ha–1. Twin rows did not increase yield relative to single rows, and twin rows often yielded significantly less at plant densities greater than 111,195 plants ha–1. Mean responses to supplemental fertility were 1.0 and 0.3 Mg ha–1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. There was no interaction between plant density and P fertility suggesting that extra resource availability does not necessarily overcome inter-plant competition. In 2011, two hybrids of contrasting ear type were included to explore the role of hybrid selection in plant density response. Maximum yields of each hybrid were achieved at contrasting densities, and genetic differences in plant density tolerance appeared to be related to (i) kernel number response on a per-area basis and (ii) stability of individual kernel weight. These results highlight the importance of independently optimizing row spacing and soil fertility while understanding the plant density response characteristics of maize hybrids.

AB - Inter-plant competition must be carefully managed to realize the yield potential of increased plant density of maize (Zea mays L.). Twin row planting arrangement, P fertility, and hybrid selection may be important components of managing increased plant density. Our hypotheses were (i) that twin row planting arrangement would be superior to traditional 0.76-m rows at ultra-high densities and (ii) that supplemental P fertility would alleviate inter-plant competition. In 2010 and 2011, twin row planting arrangement was compared to single 0.76-m rows across densities ranging from 61,775 to 160,615 plants ha–1 and P fertility treatments ranging from 0 to 168 kg P2O5 ha–1. Twin rows did not increase yield relative to single rows, and twin rows often yielded significantly less at plant densities greater than 111,195 plants ha–1. Mean responses to supplemental fertility were 1.0 and 0.3 Mg ha–1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. There was no interaction between plant density and P fertility suggesting that extra resource availability does not necessarily overcome inter-plant competition. In 2011, two hybrids of contrasting ear type were included to explore the role of hybrid selection in plant density response. Maximum yields of each hybrid were achieved at contrasting densities, and genetic differences in plant density tolerance appeared to be related to (i) kernel number response on a per-area basis and (ii) stability of individual kernel weight. These results highlight the importance of independently optimizing row spacing and soil fertility while understanding the plant density response characteristics of maize hybrids.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907050439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907050439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2134/agronj2013.0382

DO - 10.2134/agronj2013.0382

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84907050439

VL - 106

SP - 1838

EP - 1846

JO - Agronomy Journal

JF - Agronomy Journal

SN - 0002-1962

IS - 5

ER -