TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of T cell receptor affinity in the efficacy and specificity of adoptive T cell therapies
AU - Stone, Jennifer D.
AU - Kranz, David M.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Over the last several years, there has been considerable progress in the treatment of cancer using gene modified adoptive T cell therapies. Two approaches have been used, one involving the introduction of a conventional αβ T cell receptor (TCR) against a pepMHC cancer antigen, and the second involving introduction of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) consisting of a single-chain antibody as an Fvfragment linked to transmembrane and signaling domains. In this review, we focus on one aspect of TCR-mediated adoptive T cell therapies, the impact of the affinity of the aß TCR for the pepMHC cancer antigen on both efficacy and specificity. We discuss the advantages of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating potent activity of CD4 T cells. This is balanced with the potential disadvantage of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating greater self-reactivity against a wider range of structurally similar antigenic peptides, especially in synergy with the CD8 co-receptor. Both TCR affinity and target selection will influence potential safety issues. We suggest pre-clinical strategies that might be used to examine each TCR for possible on-target and off-target side effects due to self-reactivities, and to adjust TCR affinities accordingly.
AB - Over the last several years, there has been considerable progress in the treatment of cancer using gene modified adoptive T cell therapies. Two approaches have been used, one involving the introduction of a conventional αβ T cell receptor (TCR) against a pepMHC cancer antigen, and the second involving introduction of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) consisting of a single-chain antibody as an Fvfragment linked to transmembrane and signaling domains. In this review, we focus on one aspect of TCR-mediated adoptive T cell therapies, the impact of the affinity of the aß TCR for the pepMHC cancer antigen on both efficacy and specificity. We discuss the advantages of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating potent activity of CD4 T cells. This is balanced with the potential disadvantage of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating greater self-reactivity against a wider range of structurally similar antigenic peptides, especially in synergy with the CD8 co-receptor. Both TCR affinity and target selection will influence potential safety issues. We suggest pre-clinical strategies that might be used to examine each TCR for possible on-target and off-target side effects due to self-reactivities, and to adjust TCR affinities accordingly.
KW - Adoptive T cell therapy
KW - T cell cross-reactivity
KW - T cell sensitivity
KW - TCR affinity
KW - Tumor-associated epitopes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883705209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883705209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00244
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00244
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23970885
AN - SCOPUS:84883705209
SN - 1664-3224
VL - 4
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
JF - Frontiers in Immunology
IS - AUG
M1 - Article 244
ER -