Robbing Peter to pay Paul: Feedback environments and enacted priorities in response to competing task demands

Susan J. Ashford, Gregory Northcraft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we present a model of how the feedback that surrounds performers as they do their work affects their attention and effort allocation in multiple goal situations. Differences in the frequency, specificity, and source of feedback for the multiple goals that performers hold are posited to affect attention and effort allocations. By differentially allocating their efforts in response to the feedback environment, performers often enact priorities that may or may not match the assigned priorities of the organization. These attention and effort allocations are posited to affect relative performance on the goals performers hold (or are assigned). Practical implications for performance management in organizations are addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)537-559
Number of pages23
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Enacted priorities
  • Feedback environments
  • Performance
  • Task demands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robbing Peter to pay Paul: Feedback environments and enacted priorities in response to competing task demands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this