RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN STATE HABEAS PROCEEDINGS.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An essay is presented on the effects of U.S. Supreme Court in the Court case Danforth v. Minnesota on the practices of state courts for post-conviction proceedings. It mentions that state habeas petitioners getting benefit of new federal rules of constitutional criminal procedure. It highlights retroactivity jurisprudence and retroactivity practices of state court.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1747-1765
Number of pages19
JournalAlbany law review
Volume74
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence

Keywords

  • UNITED States. Supreme Court
  • STATE courts
  • RETROACTIVE laws
  • HABEAS corpus
  • CRIMINAL procedure
  • JURISPRUDENCE
  • PRACTICE of law

Cite this

RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN STATE HABEAS PROCEEDINGS. / Mazzone, Jason.

In: Albany law review, Vol. 74, No. 4, 01.08.2011, p. 1747-1765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb0238578a00477183ce5db81d08795a,
title = "RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN STATE HABEAS PROCEEDINGS.",
abstract = "An essay is presented on the effects of U.S. Supreme Court in the Court case Danforth v. Minnesota on the practices of state courts for post-conviction proceedings. It mentions that state habeas petitioners getting benefit of new federal rules of constitutional criminal procedure. It highlights retroactivity jurisprudence and retroactivity practices of state court.",
keywords = "UNITED States. Supreme Court, STATE courts, RETROACTIVE laws, HABEAS corpus, CRIMINAL procedure, JURISPRUDENCE, PRACTICE of law",
author = "Jason Mazzone",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1747--1765",
journal = "Albany law review",
issn = "0002-4678",
publisher = "Albany Law School",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN STATE HABEAS PROCEEDINGS.

AU - Mazzone, Jason

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - An essay is presented on the effects of U.S. Supreme Court in the Court case Danforth v. Minnesota on the practices of state courts for post-conviction proceedings. It mentions that state habeas petitioners getting benefit of new federal rules of constitutional criminal procedure. It highlights retroactivity jurisprudence and retroactivity practices of state court.

AB - An essay is presented on the effects of U.S. Supreme Court in the Court case Danforth v. Minnesota on the practices of state courts for post-conviction proceedings. It mentions that state habeas petitioners getting benefit of new federal rules of constitutional criminal procedure. It highlights retroactivity jurisprudence and retroactivity practices of state court.

KW - UNITED States. Supreme Court

KW - STATE courts

KW - RETROACTIVE laws

KW - HABEAS corpus

KW - CRIMINAL procedure

KW - JURISPRUDENCE

KW - PRACTICE of law

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 1747

EP - 1765

JO - Albany law review

JF - Albany law review

SN - 0002-4678

IS - 4

ER -