Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing

Kara D. Federmeier, Marta Kutas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Both cerebral hemispheres are involved in language processing, each playing a unique role that may derive from differences in knowledge organization and on-line meaning integration. Here, we examine lateralized differences in knowledge representation and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by words in sentences. Volunteers read pairs of sentences ending with three target types: (1) expected words, (2) unexpected words from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected words from an unexpected category. Context was presented word by word at fixation while targets were presented two degrees to the right or left of fixation. ERPs to unexpected endings were more negative than those to expected endings in both visual fields. However, when presented to the right visual field (left hemisphere), unexpected items from the expected category elicited smaller N400s than those from an unexpected category. In contrast, when presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere) all unexpected endings elicited N400s of similar amplitude. Thus, while both hemispheres are sensitive to context, only the left hemisphere is sensitive to semantic similarity between an unexpected ending and the expected completion. The results suggest lateralized differences in how new information is integrated into sentences. We propose that right hemisphere processing is best characterized as 'integrative'; new information is compared directly with context information. In contrast, left hemisphere processing is better characterized as 'predictive'; the processing of context leads to an expectation about the semantic features of upcoming items and new information is compared with that expectation rather than directly with the context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-392
Number of pages20
JournalCognitive Brain Research
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Visual Fields
Semantics
Evoked Potentials
Cerebrum
Volunteers
Language

Keywords

  • Event-related potentials
  • Hemispheric differences
  • Language
  • N400
  • Sentence processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Right words and left words : Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. / Federmeier, Kara D.; Kutas, Marta.

In: Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 25.10.1999, p. 373-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3862e72db9564081be9162857f5d3be2,
title = "Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing",
abstract = "Both cerebral hemispheres are involved in language processing, each playing a unique role that may derive from differences in knowledge organization and on-line meaning integration. Here, we examine lateralized differences in knowledge representation and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by words in sentences. Volunteers read pairs of sentences ending with three target types: (1) expected words, (2) unexpected words from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected words from an unexpected category. Context was presented word by word at fixation while targets were presented two degrees to the right or left of fixation. ERPs to unexpected endings were more negative than those to expected endings in both visual fields. However, when presented to the right visual field (left hemisphere), unexpected items from the expected category elicited smaller N400s than those from an unexpected category. In contrast, when presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere) all unexpected endings elicited N400s of similar amplitude. Thus, while both hemispheres are sensitive to context, only the left hemisphere is sensitive to semantic similarity between an unexpected ending and the expected completion. The results suggest lateralized differences in how new information is integrated into sentences. We propose that right hemisphere processing is best characterized as 'integrative'; new information is compared directly with context information. In contrast, left hemisphere processing is better characterized as 'predictive'; the processing of context leads to an expectation about the semantic features of upcoming items and new information is compared with that expectation rather than directly with the context.",
keywords = "Event-related potentials, Hemispheric differences, Language, N400, Sentence processing",
author = "Federmeier, {Kara D.} and Marta Kutas",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00036-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "373--392",
journal = "Cognitive Brain Research",
issn = "0926-6410",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Right words and left words

T2 - Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing

AU - Federmeier, Kara D.

AU - Kutas, Marta

PY - 1999/10/25

Y1 - 1999/10/25

N2 - Both cerebral hemispheres are involved in language processing, each playing a unique role that may derive from differences in knowledge organization and on-line meaning integration. Here, we examine lateralized differences in knowledge representation and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by words in sentences. Volunteers read pairs of sentences ending with three target types: (1) expected words, (2) unexpected words from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected words from an unexpected category. Context was presented word by word at fixation while targets were presented two degrees to the right or left of fixation. ERPs to unexpected endings were more negative than those to expected endings in both visual fields. However, when presented to the right visual field (left hemisphere), unexpected items from the expected category elicited smaller N400s than those from an unexpected category. In contrast, when presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere) all unexpected endings elicited N400s of similar amplitude. Thus, while both hemispheres are sensitive to context, only the left hemisphere is sensitive to semantic similarity between an unexpected ending and the expected completion. The results suggest lateralized differences in how new information is integrated into sentences. We propose that right hemisphere processing is best characterized as 'integrative'; new information is compared directly with context information. In contrast, left hemisphere processing is better characterized as 'predictive'; the processing of context leads to an expectation about the semantic features of upcoming items and new information is compared with that expectation rather than directly with the context.

AB - Both cerebral hemispheres are involved in language processing, each playing a unique role that may derive from differences in knowledge organization and on-line meaning integration. Here, we examine lateralized differences in knowledge representation and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by words in sentences. Volunteers read pairs of sentences ending with three target types: (1) expected words, (2) unexpected words from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected words from an unexpected category. Context was presented word by word at fixation while targets were presented two degrees to the right or left of fixation. ERPs to unexpected endings were more negative than those to expected endings in both visual fields. However, when presented to the right visual field (left hemisphere), unexpected items from the expected category elicited smaller N400s than those from an unexpected category. In contrast, when presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere) all unexpected endings elicited N400s of similar amplitude. Thus, while both hemispheres are sensitive to context, only the left hemisphere is sensitive to semantic similarity between an unexpected ending and the expected completion. The results suggest lateralized differences in how new information is integrated into sentences. We propose that right hemisphere processing is best characterized as 'integrative'; new information is compared directly with context information. In contrast, left hemisphere processing is better characterized as 'predictive'; the processing of context leads to an expectation about the semantic features of upcoming items and new information is compared with that expectation rather than directly with the context.

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Hemispheric differences

KW - Language

KW - N400

KW - Sentence processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032703247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032703247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00036-1

DO - 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00036-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 10556614

AN - SCOPUS:0032703247

VL - 8

SP - 373

EP - 392

JO - Cognitive Brain Research

JF - Cognitive Brain Research

SN - 0926-6410

IS - 3

ER -