Revisiting Random Points: Combinatorial Complexity and Algorithms

Sariel Har-Peled, Elfarouk Harb

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Consider a set P of n points picked uniformly and independently from [0, 1]d, where d is a constant. Such a point set is well behaved in many aspects and has several structural properties. For example, for a fixed r ∈ [0, 1], we prove that the number of pairs of (P 2) at a distance at most r is concentrated within an interval of length O(n log n) around the expected number of such pairs for the torus distance. We also provide a new proof that the expected complexity of the Delaunay triangulation of P is linear – the new proof is simpler and more direct than previous proofs. In addition, we present simple linear time algorithms to construct the Delaunay triangulation, Euclidean MST, and the convex hull of the points of P. The MST algorithm uses an interesting divide-and-conquer approach. Finally, we present a simple Õ(n4/3) time algorithm for the distance selection problem, for d = 2, providing a new natural justification for the mysterious appearance of n4/3 in algorithms for this problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2024 Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms, SOSA 2024
EditorsMerav Parter, Seth Pettie
PublisherSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications
Pages244-268
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781713887171
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Event7th SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms, SOSA 2024 - Alexandria, United States
Duration: Jan 8 2024Jan 10 2024

Publication series

Name2024 Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms, SOSA 2024

Conference

Conference7th SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms, SOSA 2024
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityAlexandria
Period1/8/241/10/24

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting Random Points: Combinatorial Complexity and Algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this