Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan

P. Neve, J. N. Barney, Y. Buckley, R. D. Cousens, S. Graham, N. R. Jordan, A. Lawton-Rauh, M. Liebman, M. B. Mesgaran, M. Schut, J. Shaw, J. Storkey, B. Baraibar, R. S. Baucom, M. Chalak, D. Z. Childs, S. Christensen, H. Eizenberg, C. Fernández-Quintanilla, K. FrenchM. Harsch, S. Heijting, L. Harrison, D. Loddo, M. Macel, N. Maczey, A. Merotto, D. Mortensen, J. Necajeva, D. A. Peltzer, J. Recasens, M. Renton, M. Riemens, M. Sønderskov, M. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Weedy plants pose a major threat to food security, biodiversity, ecosystem services and consequently to human health and wellbeing. However, many currently used weed management approaches are increasingly unsustainable. To address this knowledge and practice gap, in June 2014, 35 weed and invasion ecologists, weed scientists, evolutionary biologists and social scientists convened a workshop to explore current and future perspectives and approaches in weed ecology and management. A horizon scanning exercise ranked a list of 124 pre-submitted questions to identify a priority list of 30 questions. These questions are discussed under seven themed headings that represent areas for renewed and emerging focus for the disciplines of weed research and practice. The themed areas considered the need for transdisciplinarity, increased adoption of integrated weed management and agroecological approaches, better understanding of weed evolution, climate change, weed invasiveness and finally, disciplinary challenges for weed science. Almost all the challenges identified rested on the need for continued efforts to diversify and integrate agroecological, socio-economic and technological approaches in weed management. These challenges are not newly conceived, though their continued prominence as research priorities highlights an ongoing intransigence that must be addressed through a more system-oriented and transdisciplinary research agenda that seeks an embedded integration of public and private research approaches. This horizon scanning exercise thus set out the building blocks needed for future weed management research and practice; however, the challenge ahead is to identify effective ways in which sufficient research and implementation efforts can be directed towards these needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-258
Number of pages9
JournalWeed Research
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

weed
weeds
ecology
weed control
exercise
private research
weed science
public research
integrated weed management
A horizons
ecologists
food security
ecosystem services
biologists
human health
socioeconomics
climate change
biodiversity
invasiveness
ecosystem service

Keywords

  • agroecology
  • integrated weed management
  • invasive plants
  • transdisciplinary research
  • weed adaptation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Neve, P., Barney, J. N., Buckley, Y., Cousens, R. D., Graham, S., Jordan, N. R., ... Williams, M. (2018). Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan. Weed Research, 58(4), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12304

Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management : a horizon scan. / Neve, P.; Barney, J. N.; Buckley, Y.; Cousens, R. D.; Graham, S.; Jordan, N. R.; Lawton-Rauh, A.; Liebman, M.; Mesgaran, M. B.; Schut, M.; Shaw, J.; Storkey, J.; Baraibar, B.; Baucom, R. S.; Chalak, M.; Childs, D. Z.; Christensen, S.; Eizenberg, H.; Fernández-Quintanilla, C.; French, K.; Harsch, M.; Heijting, S.; Harrison, L.; Loddo, D.; Macel, M.; Maczey, N.; Merotto, A.; Mortensen, D.; Necajeva, J.; Peltzer, D. A.; Recasens, J.; Renton, M.; Riemens, M.; Sønderskov, M.; Williams, M.

In: Weed Research, Vol. 58, No. 4, 08.2018, p. 250-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Neve, P, Barney, JN, Buckley, Y, Cousens, RD, Graham, S, Jordan, NR, Lawton-Rauh, A, Liebman, M, Mesgaran, MB, Schut, M, Shaw, J, Storkey, J, Baraibar, B, Baucom, RS, Chalak, M, Childs, DZ, Christensen, S, Eizenberg, H, Fernández-Quintanilla, C, French, K, Harsch, M, Heijting, S, Harrison, L, Loddo, D, Macel, M, Maczey, N, Merotto, A, Mortensen, D, Necajeva, J, Peltzer, DA, Recasens, J, Renton, M, Riemens, M, Sønderskov, M & Williams, M 2018, 'Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan', Weed Research, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12304
Neve P, Barney JN, Buckley Y, Cousens RD, Graham S, Jordan NR et al. Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan. Weed Research. 2018 Aug;58(4):250-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12304
Neve, P. ; Barney, J. N. ; Buckley, Y. ; Cousens, R. D. ; Graham, S. ; Jordan, N. R. ; Lawton-Rauh, A. ; Liebman, M. ; Mesgaran, M. B. ; Schut, M. ; Shaw, J. ; Storkey, J. ; Baraibar, B. ; Baucom, R. S. ; Chalak, M. ; Childs, D. Z. ; Christensen, S. ; Eizenberg, H. ; Fernández-Quintanilla, C. ; French, K. ; Harsch, M. ; Heijting, S. ; Harrison, L. ; Loddo, D. ; Macel, M. ; Maczey, N. ; Merotto, A. ; Mortensen, D. ; Necajeva, J. ; Peltzer, D. A. ; Recasens, J. ; Renton, M. ; Riemens, M. ; Sønderskov, M. ; Williams, M. / Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management : a horizon scan. In: Weed Research. 2018 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 250-258.
@article{de5773c3cc724ababb632f3f212bf310,
title = "Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan",
abstract = "Weedy plants pose a major threat to food security, biodiversity, ecosystem services and consequently to human health and wellbeing. However, many currently used weed management approaches are increasingly unsustainable. To address this knowledge and practice gap, in June 2014, 35 weed and invasion ecologists, weed scientists, evolutionary biologists and social scientists convened a workshop to explore current and future perspectives and approaches in weed ecology and management. A horizon scanning exercise ranked a list of 124 pre-submitted questions to identify a priority list of 30 questions. These questions are discussed under seven themed headings that represent areas for renewed and emerging focus for the disciplines of weed research and practice. The themed areas considered the need for transdisciplinarity, increased adoption of integrated weed management and agroecological approaches, better understanding of weed evolution, climate change, weed invasiveness and finally, disciplinary challenges for weed science. Almost all the challenges identified rested on the need for continued efforts to diversify and integrate agroecological, socio-economic and technological approaches in weed management. These challenges are not newly conceived, though their continued prominence as research priorities highlights an ongoing intransigence that must be addressed through a more system-oriented and transdisciplinary research agenda that seeks an embedded integration of public and private research approaches. This horizon scanning exercise thus set out the building blocks needed for future weed management research and practice; however, the challenge ahead is to identify effective ways in which sufficient research and implementation efforts can be directed towards these needs.",
keywords = "agroecology, integrated weed management, invasive plants, transdisciplinary research, weed adaptation",
author = "P. Neve and Barney, {J. N.} and Y. Buckley and Cousens, {R. D.} and S. Graham and Jordan, {N. R.} and A. Lawton-Rauh and M. Liebman and Mesgaran, {M. B.} and M. Schut and J. Shaw and J. Storkey and B. Baraibar and Baucom, {R. S.} and M. Chalak and Childs, {D. Z.} and S. Christensen and H. Eizenberg and C. Fern{\'a}ndez-Quintanilla and K. French and M. Harsch and S. Heijting and L. Harrison and D. Loddo and M. Macel and N. Maczey and A. Merotto and D. Mortensen and J. Necajeva and Peltzer, {D. A.} and J. Recasens and M. Renton and M. Riemens and M. S{\o}nderskov and M. Williams",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/wre.12304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "250--258",
journal = "Weed Research",
issn = "0043-1737",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management

T2 - a horizon scan

AU - Neve, P.

AU - Barney, J. N.

AU - Buckley, Y.

AU - Cousens, R. D.

AU - Graham, S.

AU - Jordan, N. R.

AU - Lawton-Rauh, A.

AU - Liebman, M.

AU - Mesgaran, M. B.

AU - Schut, M.

AU - Shaw, J.

AU - Storkey, J.

AU - Baraibar, B.

AU - Baucom, R. S.

AU - Chalak, M.

AU - Childs, D. Z.

AU - Christensen, S.

AU - Eizenberg, H.

AU - Fernández-Quintanilla, C.

AU - French, K.

AU - Harsch, M.

AU - Heijting, S.

AU - Harrison, L.

AU - Loddo, D.

AU - Macel, M.

AU - Maczey, N.

AU - Merotto, A.

AU - Mortensen, D.

AU - Necajeva, J.

AU - Peltzer, D. A.

AU - Recasens, J.

AU - Renton, M.

AU - Riemens, M.

AU - Sønderskov, M.

AU - Williams, M.

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Weedy plants pose a major threat to food security, biodiversity, ecosystem services and consequently to human health and wellbeing. However, many currently used weed management approaches are increasingly unsustainable. To address this knowledge and practice gap, in June 2014, 35 weed and invasion ecologists, weed scientists, evolutionary biologists and social scientists convened a workshop to explore current and future perspectives and approaches in weed ecology and management. A horizon scanning exercise ranked a list of 124 pre-submitted questions to identify a priority list of 30 questions. These questions are discussed under seven themed headings that represent areas for renewed and emerging focus for the disciplines of weed research and practice. The themed areas considered the need for transdisciplinarity, increased adoption of integrated weed management and agroecological approaches, better understanding of weed evolution, climate change, weed invasiveness and finally, disciplinary challenges for weed science. Almost all the challenges identified rested on the need for continued efforts to diversify and integrate agroecological, socio-economic and technological approaches in weed management. These challenges are not newly conceived, though their continued prominence as research priorities highlights an ongoing intransigence that must be addressed through a more system-oriented and transdisciplinary research agenda that seeks an embedded integration of public and private research approaches. This horizon scanning exercise thus set out the building blocks needed for future weed management research and practice; however, the challenge ahead is to identify effective ways in which sufficient research and implementation efforts can be directed towards these needs.

AB - Weedy plants pose a major threat to food security, biodiversity, ecosystem services and consequently to human health and wellbeing. However, many currently used weed management approaches are increasingly unsustainable. To address this knowledge and practice gap, in June 2014, 35 weed and invasion ecologists, weed scientists, evolutionary biologists and social scientists convened a workshop to explore current and future perspectives and approaches in weed ecology and management. A horizon scanning exercise ranked a list of 124 pre-submitted questions to identify a priority list of 30 questions. These questions are discussed under seven themed headings that represent areas for renewed and emerging focus for the disciplines of weed research and practice. The themed areas considered the need for transdisciplinarity, increased adoption of integrated weed management and agroecological approaches, better understanding of weed evolution, climate change, weed invasiveness and finally, disciplinary challenges for weed science. Almost all the challenges identified rested on the need for continued efforts to diversify and integrate agroecological, socio-economic and technological approaches in weed management. These challenges are not newly conceived, though their continued prominence as research priorities highlights an ongoing intransigence that must be addressed through a more system-oriented and transdisciplinary research agenda that seeks an embedded integration of public and private research approaches. This horizon scanning exercise thus set out the building blocks needed for future weed management research and practice; however, the challenge ahead is to identify effective ways in which sufficient research and implementation efforts can be directed towards these needs.

KW - agroecology

KW - integrated weed management

KW - invasive plants

KW - transdisciplinary research

KW - weed adaptation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044441650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044441650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/wre.12304

DO - 10.1111/wre.12304

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85044441650

VL - 58

SP - 250

EP - 258

JO - Weed Research

JF - Weed Research

SN - 0043-1737

IS - 4

ER -