TY - JOUR
T1 - Review and categorization of existing studies on the estimation of probabilistic failure metrics for Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary piping and steam generator tubes in Nuclear Power Plants
AU - Cheng, Wen Chi
AU - Sakurahara, Tatsuya
AU - Zhang, Sai
AU - Farshadmanesh, Pegah
AU - Reihani, Seyed
AU - Kee, Ernie
AU - Mohaghegh, Zahra
AU - Heckmann, Klaus
AU - Sievers, Jürgen
AU - Lydell, Bengt
AU - Zammali, Chokri
AU - Yuan, Xian Xun
AU - Duan, Xinjian
AU - Alzbutas, Robertas
AU - Lee, Gyeong Geun
AU - Karim, Julia Abdul
AU - Morozov, Vladimir
AU - Takasugi, Cole
AU - Jevremovic, Tatjana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - This paper presents the first output of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP), titled Methodology for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water-Cooled Reactors (AWCRs), launched in 2018. This IAEA CRP is aimed at developing a good-practices document for estimating the probabilistic failure metrics of piping in AWCRs. The reliability of piping that comprise the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary (RCPB) is important for maintaining safe and stable operations of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) because failure of those piping components could lead to undesirable consequences, such as plant shutdown, costly repair, the occurrence of Loss-of-Coolant Accidents (LOCAs) and, possibly, subsequent core damage or large release events. Probabilistic failure metrics (e.g., failure rate, failure frequency, or failure probability) of RCPB components are the key inputs to the Probabilistic Safety/Risk Assessment (PSA/PRA) and risk management of NPPs. The estimation of probabilistic failure metrics, however, is challenging, especially for AWCRs, due to the lack of operating experience. Therefore, as the first step of the IAEA CRP activities, this paper is developed to provide a literature review of the existing studies (from 2000 to April 2019) on the estimation of probabilistic failure metrics for RCPB piping and Steam Generator (SG) tubes of NPPs and to categorize them based on four criteria: (1) explicitness of incorporation of physical failure mechanisms; (2) types of failure characterization; (3) types of physical models for degradation; and (4) explicitness of consideration of maintenance. The existing studies are also analyzed from the viewpoint of the following key aspects: (i) uncertainty analysis, (ii) sensitivity analysis, (iii) validation strategies, and (iv) the areas of applications.
AB - This paper presents the first output of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP), titled Methodology for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water-Cooled Reactors (AWCRs), launched in 2018. This IAEA CRP is aimed at developing a good-practices document for estimating the probabilistic failure metrics of piping in AWCRs. The reliability of piping that comprise the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary (RCPB) is important for maintaining safe and stable operations of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) because failure of those piping components could lead to undesirable consequences, such as plant shutdown, costly repair, the occurrence of Loss-of-Coolant Accidents (LOCAs) and, possibly, subsequent core damage or large release events. Probabilistic failure metrics (e.g., failure rate, failure frequency, or failure probability) of RCPB components are the key inputs to the Probabilistic Safety/Risk Assessment (PSA/PRA) and risk management of NPPs. The estimation of probabilistic failure metrics, however, is challenging, especially for AWCRs, due to the lack of operating experience. Therefore, as the first step of the IAEA CRP activities, this paper is developed to provide a literature review of the existing studies (from 2000 to April 2019) on the estimation of probabilistic failure metrics for RCPB piping and Steam Generator (SG) tubes of NPPs and to categorize them based on four criteria: (1) explicitness of incorporation of physical failure mechanisms; (2) types of failure characterization; (3) types of physical models for degradation; and (4) explicitness of consideration of maintenance. The existing studies are also analyzed from the viewpoint of the following key aspects: (i) uncertainty analysis, (ii) sensitivity analysis, (iii) validation strategies, and (iv) the areas of applications.
KW - Loss of coolant accident
KW - Piping
KW - Probabilistic risk assessment
KW - Probabilistic safety assessment
KW - Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary
KW - Steam generator tubes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070954332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070954332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103105
DO - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103105
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85070954332
SN - 0149-1970
VL - 118
JO - Progress in Nuclear Energy
JF - Progress in Nuclear Energy
M1 - 103105
ER -