TY - JOUR
T1 - Reversal shift in phonotactic learning during language production
T2 - Evidence for incremental learning
AU - Anderson, Nathaniel D.
AU - Holmes, Eric W.
AU - Dell, Gary S.
AU - Middleton, Erica L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Experiments 1, 2, and 4 were first reported at the Psychonomic Society annual meeting, and were part of a University of Illinois Ph.D dissertation in psychology to the first author. This research was supported by NIH R01 HD086099
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Speakers implicitly learn novel phonotactic patterns while producing strings of syllables. The learning is revealed in their speech errors. For example, if /f/ is artificially restricted to the syllable onset position and /s/ is restricted to the coda position, speakers’ slips will respect these constraints, demonstrating learning. The mechanism behind this learning was investigated by reversal shift. In two experiments, speakers produced syllable sequences for 32 trials in which one consonant was constrained to be an onset and one, a coda. Then for the next 32 trials, the constraints were reversed; for example, /f/ is now a coda and /s/ an onset. Over a third block of 32 trials, the constraints were reversed again back to the original rule. The learning of the reversed rules was slow in comparison to rapid learning of the original rule, providing evidence that the underlying mechanism is incremental. To learn a reversed rule, first one must unlearn the original association before making progress on the new rule. This pattern of rapid initial learning and slow reversal learning was replicated in a nonspeech analogue of the syllable production task. Participants pushed sequences of buttons, in which finger presses corresponded to consonants and thumb presses to vowels. A control experiment found that non-reversal shifts between blocks are easily learned, showing that the difficulty is specifically with reversal shifts. A final experiment provided evidence that learning in these experiments is greater when productions are more errorful.
AB - Speakers implicitly learn novel phonotactic patterns while producing strings of syllables. The learning is revealed in their speech errors. For example, if /f/ is artificially restricted to the syllable onset position and /s/ is restricted to the coda position, speakers’ slips will respect these constraints, demonstrating learning. The mechanism behind this learning was investigated by reversal shift. In two experiments, speakers produced syllable sequences for 32 trials in which one consonant was constrained to be an onset and one, a coda. Then for the next 32 trials, the constraints were reversed; for example, /f/ is now a coda and /s/ an onset. Over a third block of 32 trials, the constraints were reversed again back to the original rule. The learning of the reversed rules was slow in comparison to rapid learning of the original rule, providing evidence that the underlying mechanism is incremental. To learn a reversed rule, first one must unlearn the original association before making progress on the new rule. This pattern of rapid initial learning and slow reversal learning was replicated in a nonspeech analogue of the syllable production task. Participants pushed sequences of buttons, in which finger presses corresponded to consonants and thumb presses to vowels. A control experiment found that non-reversal shifts between blocks are easily learned, showing that the difficulty is specifically with reversal shifts. A final experiment provided evidence that learning in these experiments is greater when productions are more errorful.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062696989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062696989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062696989
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 106
SP - 135
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
ER -