Resolving regulatory uncertainty: Legislative language for potentially invasive bioenergy feedstocks

Lauren D. Quinn, Elise C. Scott, A. Bryan Endres, Jacob N. Barney, Thomas B. Voigt, James Mccubbins

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Concerns about invasions by novel bioenergy feedstocks are valid, given the parallels between the traits of energy crops and those of many common invasive plants. As the bioenergy industry is poised to introduce nonnative bioenergy crops to large acreages in the United States under state and federal mandates, it is important to consider these concerns - and not simply in an academic sense. Instead, the prevention of invasions should be codified in statutes and regulations pertaining to bioenergy production on both the state and federal level. Unfortunately, this is not occurring regularly or consistently at this time. The few existing regulations that do consider invasiveness in bioenergy systems suffer from vague terminology that could have major economic, environmental, and legal consequences. Here, we discuss existing regulatory challenges and provide solutions to address invasion potential of bioenergy crops. We provide model definitions and provisions to be included in revised or new state and federal regulations, including an invasion risk assessment process, a permit and bond system for high-risk crops, and a risk mitigation provision for all novel crops. Our proposal provides a consistent and transparent system that will allow the industry to move forward with minimal risk of invasion by novel feedstocks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-915
Number of pages7
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

energy crops
bioenergy
feedstocks
Feedstocks
Crops
uncertainty
risk assessment process
bioenergy industry
crop
environmental economics
risk reduction
terminology
crops
industry
Terminology
energy crop
invasiveness
Risk assessment
Industry
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Biofuel
  • Bond
  • Feedstock
  • Invasive
  • Nonnative
  • Policy
  • Regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Resolving regulatory uncertainty : Legislative language for potentially invasive bioenergy feedstocks. / Quinn, Lauren D.; Scott, Elise C.; Endres, A. Bryan; Barney, Jacob N.; Voigt, Thomas B.; Mccubbins, James.

In: GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 909-915.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Quinn, Lauren D. ; Scott, Elise C. ; Endres, A. Bryan ; Barney, Jacob N. ; Voigt, Thomas B. ; Mccubbins, James. / Resolving regulatory uncertainty : Legislative language for potentially invasive bioenergy feedstocks. In: GCB Bioenergy. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 5. pp. 909-915.
@article{0714e41c52464edcbc3432513b70edca,
title = "Resolving regulatory uncertainty: Legislative language for potentially invasive bioenergy feedstocks",
abstract = "Concerns about invasions by novel bioenergy feedstocks are valid, given the parallels between the traits of energy crops and those of many common invasive plants. As the bioenergy industry is poised to introduce nonnative bioenergy crops to large acreages in the United States under state and federal mandates, it is important to consider these concerns - and not simply in an academic sense. Instead, the prevention of invasions should be codified in statutes and regulations pertaining to bioenergy production on both the state and federal level. Unfortunately, this is not occurring regularly or consistently at this time. The few existing regulations that do consider invasiveness in bioenergy systems suffer from vague terminology that could have major economic, environmental, and legal consequences. Here, we discuss existing regulatory challenges and provide solutions to address invasion potential of bioenergy crops. We provide model definitions and provisions to be included in revised or new state and federal regulations, including an invasion risk assessment process, a permit and bond system for high-risk crops, and a risk mitigation provision for all novel crops. Our proposal provides a consistent and transparent system that will allow the industry to move forward with minimal risk of invasion by novel feedstocks.",
keywords = "Biofuel, Bond, Feedstock, Invasive, Nonnative, Policy, Regulation",
author = "Quinn, {Lauren D.} and Scott, {Elise C.} and Endres, {A. Bryan} and Barney, {Jacob N.} and Voigt, {Thomas B.} and James Mccubbins",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12216",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "909--915",
journal = "GCB Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolving regulatory uncertainty

T2 - Legislative language for potentially invasive bioenergy feedstocks

AU - Quinn, Lauren D.

AU - Scott, Elise C.

AU - Endres, A. Bryan

AU - Barney, Jacob N.

AU - Voigt, Thomas B.

AU - Mccubbins, James

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Concerns about invasions by novel bioenergy feedstocks are valid, given the parallels between the traits of energy crops and those of many common invasive plants. As the bioenergy industry is poised to introduce nonnative bioenergy crops to large acreages in the United States under state and federal mandates, it is important to consider these concerns - and not simply in an academic sense. Instead, the prevention of invasions should be codified in statutes and regulations pertaining to bioenergy production on both the state and federal level. Unfortunately, this is not occurring regularly or consistently at this time. The few existing regulations that do consider invasiveness in bioenergy systems suffer from vague terminology that could have major economic, environmental, and legal consequences. Here, we discuss existing regulatory challenges and provide solutions to address invasion potential of bioenergy crops. We provide model definitions and provisions to be included in revised or new state and federal regulations, including an invasion risk assessment process, a permit and bond system for high-risk crops, and a risk mitigation provision for all novel crops. Our proposal provides a consistent and transparent system that will allow the industry to move forward with minimal risk of invasion by novel feedstocks.

AB - Concerns about invasions by novel bioenergy feedstocks are valid, given the parallels between the traits of energy crops and those of many common invasive plants. As the bioenergy industry is poised to introduce nonnative bioenergy crops to large acreages in the United States under state and federal mandates, it is important to consider these concerns - and not simply in an academic sense. Instead, the prevention of invasions should be codified in statutes and regulations pertaining to bioenergy production on both the state and federal level. Unfortunately, this is not occurring regularly or consistently at this time. The few existing regulations that do consider invasiveness in bioenergy systems suffer from vague terminology that could have major economic, environmental, and legal consequences. Here, we discuss existing regulatory challenges and provide solutions to address invasion potential of bioenergy crops. We provide model definitions and provisions to be included in revised or new state and federal regulations, including an invasion risk assessment process, a permit and bond system for high-risk crops, and a risk mitigation provision for all novel crops. Our proposal provides a consistent and transparent system that will allow the industry to move forward with minimal risk of invasion by novel feedstocks.

KW - Biofuel

KW - Bond

KW - Feedstock

KW - Invasive

KW - Nonnative

KW - Policy

KW - Regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938959159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938959159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12216

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12216

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84938959159

VL - 7

SP - 909

EP - 915

JO - GCB Bioenergy

JF - GCB Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 5

ER -