Resistance to Crop Rotation

Joseph Lee Spencer, Eli Levine

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the resistance to crop rotation for managing pests. The modern concept of crop rotation goes back to the four-crop Norfolk rotation that was popular in 18th-century England. In the United States, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington experimented with a variety of rotational schemes on their farms. Rotation, along with artificial addition of lime and soil minerals, became nearly universal in England by the middle of the 19th century; immigrant farmers brought these practices to the United States where many different rotational systems were developed and used extensively during the 19th century. The discovery that a mutualism between leguminous plants and the common soil bacterium Rhizobium fixed atmospheric nitrogen that was then available to successive crops provided an explanation for some of the benefits of crop rotation. Corn grown in a 2-year rotation with soybean yields 5-20% more than corn grown in a continuous cultivation. In addition to the obvious fertility benefits, soil organic matter can be increased and soil structure may be improved when crop rotation is practiced. The best example of insect pest management using crop rotation involves control of diabroticite corn rootworm beetles in the US Corn Belt. Stephen A. Forbes suggested that because the northern corn rootworm (NCR), Diabrotica barberi, depended on availability of corn roots as food for the relatively immobile larvae, rotating production of corn with a plant that NCR larvae could not eat would destroy rootworm populations by depriving newly emerged NCR larvae of the corn roots.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInsect Resistance Management
PublisherElsevier Ltd
Pages153-183
Number of pages31
ISBN (Print)9780123738585
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Diabrotica barberi
Zea mays
corn
rootworms
Soil
England
larvae
Larva
Corn Belt region
insect control
mutualism
soil bacteria
crops
soil structure
Rhizobium
immigration
soil fertility
soil organic matter
Pest Control
pests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Spencer, J. L., & Levine, E. (2008). Resistance to Crop Rotation. In Insect Resistance Management (pp. 153-183). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1

Resistance to Crop Rotation. / Spencer, Joseph Lee; Levine, Eli.

Insect Resistance Management. Elsevier Ltd, 2008. p. 153-183.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Spencer, JL & Levine, E 2008, Resistance to Crop Rotation. in Insect Resistance Management. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 153-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1
Spencer JL, Levine E. Resistance to Crop Rotation. In Insect Resistance Management. Elsevier Ltd. 2008. p. 153-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1
Spencer, Joseph Lee ; Levine, Eli. / Resistance to Crop Rotation. Insect Resistance Management. Elsevier Ltd, 2008. pp. 153-183
@inbook{e9ef0df99e7d4e48b895bbe1fc3704b3,
title = "Resistance to Crop Rotation",
abstract = "This chapter discusses the resistance to crop rotation for managing pests. The modern concept of crop rotation goes back to the four-crop Norfolk rotation that was popular in 18th-century England. In the United States, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington experimented with a variety of rotational schemes on their farms. Rotation, along with artificial addition of lime and soil minerals, became nearly universal in England by the middle of the 19th century; immigrant farmers brought these practices to the United States where many different rotational systems were developed and used extensively during the 19th century. The discovery that a mutualism between leguminous plants and the common soil bacterium Rhizobium fixed atmospheric nitrogen that was then available to successive crops provided an explanation for some of the benefits of crop rotation. Corn grown in a 2-year rotation with soybean yields 5-20{\%} more than corn grown in a continuous cultivation. In addition to the obvious fertility benefits, soil organic matter can be increased and soil structure may be improved when crop rotation is practiced. The best example of insect pest management using crop rotation involves control of diabroticite corn rootworm beetles in the US Corn Belt. Stephen A. Forbes suggested that because the northern corn rootworm (NCR), Diabrotica barberi, depended on availability of corn roots as food for the relatively immobile larvae, rotating production of corn with a plant that NCR larvae could not eat would destroy rootworm populations by depriving newly emerged NCR larvae of the corn roots.",
author = "Spencer, {Joseph Lee} and Eli Levine",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780123738585",
pages = "153--183",
booktitle = "Insect Resistance Management",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Resistance to Crop Rotation

AU - Spencer, Joseph Lee

AU - Levine, Eli

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This chapter discusses the resistance to crop rotation for managing pests. The modern concept of crop rotation goes back to the four-crop Norfolk rotation that was popular in 18th-century England. In the United States, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington experimented with a variety of rotational schemes on their farms. Rotation, along with artificial addition of lime and soil minerals, became nearly universal in England by the middle of the 19th century; immigrant farmers brought these practices to the United States where many different rotational systems were developed and used extensively during the 19th century. The discovery that a mutualism between leguminous plants and the common soil bacterium Rhizobium fixed atmospheric nitrogen that was then available to successive crops provided an explanation for some of the benefits of crop rotation. Corn grown in a 2-year rotation with soybean yields 5-20% more than corn grown in a continuous cultivation. In addition to the obvious fertility benefits, soil organic matter can be increased and soil structure may be improved when crop rotation is practiced. The best example of insect pest management using crop rotation involves control of diabroticite corn rootworm beetles in the US Corn Belt. Stephen A. Forbes suggested that because the northern corn rootworm (NCR), Diabrotica barberi, depended on availability of corn roots as food for the relatively immobile larvae, rotating production of corn with a plant that NCR larvae could not eat would destroy rootworm populations by depriving newly emerged NCR larvae of the corn roots.

AB - This chapter discusses the resistance to crop rotation for managing pests. The modern concept of crop rotation goes back to the four-crop Norfolk rotation that was popular in 18th-century England. In the United States, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington experimented with a variety of rotational schemes on their farms. Rotation, along with artificial addition of lime and soil minerals, became nearly universal in England by the middle of the 19th century; immigrant farmers brought these practices to the United States where many different rotational systems were developed and used extensively during the 19th century. The discovery that a mutualism between leguminous plants and the common soil bacterium Rhizobium fixed atmospheric nitrogen that was then available to successive crops provided an explanation for some of the benefits of crop rotation. Corn grown in a 2-year rotation with soybean yields 5-20% more than corn grown in a continuous cultivation. In addition to the obvious fertility benefits, soil organic matter can be increased and soil structure may be improved when crop rotation is practiced. The best example of insect pest management using crop rotation involves control of diabroticite corn rootworm beetles in the US Corn Belt. Stephen A. Forbes suggested that because the northern corn rootworm (NCR), Diabrotica barberi, depended on availability of corn roots as food for the relatively immobile larvae, rotating production of corn with a plant that NCR larvae could not eat would destroy rootworm populations by depriving newly emerged NCR larvae of the corn roots.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882511880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882511880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1

DO - 10.1016/B978-012373858-5.50010-1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84882511880

SN - 9780123738585

SP - 153

EP - 183

BT - Insect Resistance Management

PB - Elsevier Ltd

ER -