TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on Evaluation Influence in India
T2 - Theorizing Beyond Process and Results to Design
AU - Goodnight, Melissa Rae
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to acknolwedge the United States Department of State and the Government of India for funding the Fulbright-Nehru student research grant that supported this study's data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This study analyzes evaluation influence theories to understand their unified contributions to a conceptual framework for research on evaluation influence (RoEI) in non-western contexts. Specifically, these theories are analyzed according to their usefulness for interpreting the consequences of the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER)—a cyclical, large-scale educational monitoring and evaluation effort in India. An ethnographic case study of ASER facilitates an empirical investigation of the field's evaluation influence theories and uncovers a new source of influence—evaluation design. The study's findings challenge a common belief in the field: that evaluation process and results are the two fountainheads of evaluation impact. Design, as a distinct third source of influence, gives rise to a novel form of evaluation consequence—design diffusion. The phenomenon of design diffusion illuminates why ASER's model for evaluation has been adopted by several other Global South nations.
AB - This study analyzes evaluation influence theories to understand their unified contributions to a conceptual framework for research on evaluation influence (RoEI) in non-western contexts. Specifically, these theories are analyzed according to their usefulness for interpreting the consequences of the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER)—a cyclical, large-scale educational monitoring and evaluation effort in India. An ethnographic case study of ASER facilitates an empirical investigation of the field's evaluation influence theories and uncovers a new source of influence—evaluation design. The study's findings challenge a common belief in the field: that evaluation process and results are the two fountainheads of evaluation impact. Design, as a distinct third source of influence, gives rise to a novel form of evaluation consequence—design diffusion. The phenomenon of design diffusion illuminates why ASER's model for evaluation has been adopted by several other Global South nations.
KW - evaluation design
KW - evaluation influence
KW - evaluation theory
KW - India
KW - research on evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144445038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144445038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10982140211050912
DO - 10.1177/10982140211050912
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144445038
SN - 1098-2140
JO - American Journal of Evaluation
JF - American Journal of Evaluation
ER -