Reply to Critics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One of the central moral challenges facing numerous political communities today is political reconciliation. In the aftermath of repression, conflict, and injustice, communities confront the task of repairing damaged relationships among citizens and between citizens and officials. In A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation, I develop a theory of what this process entails and of its moral significance. My central claim is that political relationships are damaged when and to the extent that they fail to express reciprocity and respect for agency. Failures of reciprocity and respect for agency are how relationships go wrong during extended periods of repression and conflict, and it is in cultivating these two values in relations among citizens and officials that relationships are repaired. I am very grateful for the thoughtful, incisive, and stimulating comments provided by Cindy Holder, Tracy Isaacs, and Alice MacLachlan. In this reply to their commentaries, I first provide a brief background of the motivation for my project and an overview of the main theses that I defend over the course of my book. I then turn to three kinds of concerns raised by Holder, Isaacs, and MacLachlan. The first urges me to rethink the restriction of my analysis of political reconciliation to contexts of transition. The second challenges the particular way that I conceptualize the demands of reciprocity and respect for agency in political relationships. The final set turns to my analysis of the processes that can facilitate reconciliation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-177
Number of pages13
JournalCriminal Law and Philosophy
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

reconciliation
critic
reciprocity
respect
repression
citizen
community
Reconciliation
Values

Keywords

  • International criminal trials
  • Reconciliation
  • Transitional justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Law

Cite this

Reply to Critics. / Murphy, Colleen.

In: Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 165-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Colleen. / Reply to Critics. In: Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 165-177.
@article{170ca2f25c584b2987659e852cc3dc85,
title = "Reply to Critics",
abstract = "One of the central moral challenges facing numerous political communities today is political reconciliation. In the aftermath of repression, conflict, and injustice, communities confront the task of repairing damaged relationships among citizens and between citizens and officials. In A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation, I develop a theory of what this process entails and of its moral significance. My central claim is that political relationships are damaged when and to the extent that they fail to express reciprocity and respect for agency. Failures of reciprocity and respect for agency are how relationships go wrong during extended periods of repression and conflict, and it is in cultivating these two values in relations among citizens and officials that relationships are repaired. I am very grateful for the thoughtful, incisive, and stimulating comments provided by Cindy Holder, Tracy Isaacs, and Alice MacLachlan. In this reply to their commentaries, I first provide a brief background of the motivation for my project and an overview of the main theses that I defend over the course of my book. I then turn to three kinds of concerns raised by Holder, Isaacs, and MacLachlan. The first urges me to rethink the restriction of my analysis of political reconciliation to contexts of transition. The second challenges the particular way that I conceptualize the demands of reciprocity and respect for agency in political relationships. The final set turns to my analysis of the processes that can facilitate reconciliation.",
keywords = "International criminal trials, Reconciliation, Transitional justice",
author = "Colleen Murphy",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11572-014-9295-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "165--177",
journal = "Criminal Law and Philosophy",
issn = "1871-9791",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Critics

AU - Murphy, Colleen

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - One of the central moral challenges facing numerous political communities today is political reconciliation. In the aftermath of repression, conflict, and injustice, communities confront the task of repairing damaged relationships among citizens and between citizens and officials. In A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation, I develop a theory of what this process entails and of its moral significance. My central claim is that political relationships are damaged when and to the extent that they fail to express reciprocity and respect for agency. Failures of reciprocity and respect for agency are how relationships go wrong during extended periods of repression and conflict, and it is in cultivating these two values in relations among citizens and officials that relationships are repaired. I am very grateful for the thoughtful, incisive, and stimulating comments provided by Cindy Holder, Tracy Isaacs, and Alice MacLachlan. In this reply to their commentaries, I first provide a brief background of the motivation for my project and an overview of the main theses that I defend over the course of my book. I then turn to three kinds of concerns raised by Holder, Isaacs, and MacLachlan. The first urges me to rethink the restriction of my analysis of political reconciliation to contexts of transition. The second challenges the particular way that I conceptualize the demands of reciprocity and respect for agency in political relationships. The final set turns to my analysis of the processes that can facilitate reconciliation.

AB - One of the central moral challenges facing numerous political communities today is political reconciliation. In the aftermath of repression, conflict, and injustice, communities confront the task of repairing damaged relationships among citizens and between citizens and officials. In A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation, I develop a theory of what this process entails and of its moral significance. My central claim is that political relationships are damaged when and to the extent that they fail to express reciprocity and respect for agency. Failures of reciprocity and respect for agency are how relationships go wrong during extended periods of repression and conflict, and it is in cultivating these two values in relations among citizens and officials that relationships are repaired. I am very grateful for the thoughtful, incisive, and stimulating comments provided by Cindy Holder, Tracy Isaacs, and Alice MacLachlan. In this reply to their commentaries, I first provide a brief background of the motivation for my project and an overview of the main theses that I defend over the course of my book. I then turn to three kinds of concerns raised by Holder, Isaacs, and MacLachlan. The first urges me to rethink the restriction of my analysis of political reconciliation to contexts of transition. The second challenges the particular way that I conceptualize the demands of reciprocity and respect for agency in political relationships. The final set turns to my analysis of the processes that can facilitate reconciliation.

KW - International criminal trials

KW - Reconciliation

KW - Transitional justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957431775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957431775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11572-014-9295-4

DO - 10.1007/s11572-014-9295-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84957431775

VL - 10

SP - 165

EP - 177

JO - Criminal Law and Philosophy

JF - Criminal Law and Philosophy

SN - 1871-9791

IS - 1

ER -