Reply to 'Comment on "a multivariate model based on dominant factor for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements"' by Vincenzo Palleschi, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2011, DOI: 10.1039/c1ja10197h

Zhe Wang, Jie Feng, Zheng Li

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In the previous article, Palleschi wrote a comment to our recently published paper "A multivariate model based on dominant factor for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements" (Z. Wang, J. Feng, L. Li, W. Ni and Z. Li, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2011, DOI:10.1039/c1ja10041f), 1 in which we proposed a dominant factor based PLS model. He commented that the proposed method is basically flawed since the predictions of the model are worse than the ones obtained using standard univariate approach based on calibration curve. In this reply, we try to further clarify our dominant factor based PLS model and to remove the misunderstanding. We strongly believe that our new proposed multi-variate model outperforms the conventional PLS model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2302-2306
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to 'Comment on "a multivariate model based on dominant factor for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements"' by Vincenzo Palleschi, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2011, DOI: 10.1039/c1ja10197h'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this