TY - JOUR
T1 - Replacing the U.S. income tax with a progressive consumption tax. A sequenced general equilibrium approach
AU - Fullerton, Don
AU - Shoven, John B.
AU - Whalley, John
N1 - Funding Information:
*A previous version of this paper was presented at the NBER conference on the Taxation of Capital, Cambridge MA., 16 November, 1979. We are grateful to the Offtce of Tax Analysis of the US. Treasury for linancial support and the IBM Public Economics Workshop at Stanford. Development of the theoretical model structure has been supported through NSF grant SOC-68-07417. We would like to acknowledge the generous help of A. Thomas King in developing the model structure and data set and of Larry Goulder and Charles Ballard for their tine research assistance. Many useful suggestions have been made by seminar participants at Harvard, LSE, MIT, NBER, Rochester, Yale and the Treasury Department, and bv anonymous referees. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and-not those of NBER; NSF, br the Office of Tax Analysis.
PY - 1983/2
Y1 - 1983/2
N2 - This paper examines the welfare consequences of changing the current U.S. income tax system to a progressive consumption tax. We compute a sequence of single period equilibria in which savings decisions depend on the expected future return to capital. In the presence of existing income taxes, the U.S. economy is assumed to lie on a balanced growth path. With the change to a consumption tax, individuals save more and initially consume less. As the capital stock grows, consumption eventually overtakes that of the original path, and the economy approaches the new balanced growth path with higher consumption and a greater capital stock. Both the transition and the balanced growth paths enter our welfare evaluations. We find the discounted present value of the stream of net gains is approximately $650 billion in 1973 dollars, just over 1 percent of the discounted present value of national income. Larger gains occur if further reform of capital income taxation accompanies the change. We examine the sensitivity of the results, both to the design of the consumption tax and to the values of elasticity and other parameters. The paper also contains estimates of the time required to adjust from one growth path to the other.
AB - This paper examines the welfare consequences of changing the current U.S. income tax system to a progressive consumption tax. We compute a sequence of single period equilibria in which savings decisions depend on the expected future return to capital. In the presence of existing income taxes, the U.S. economy is assumed to lie on a balanced growth path. With the change to a consumption tax, individuals save more and initially consume less. As the capital stock grows, consumption eventually overtakes that of the original path, and the economy approaches the new balanced growth path with higher consumption and a greater capital stock. Both the transition and the balanced growth paths enter our welfare evaluations. We find the discounted present value of the stream of net gains is approximately $650 billion in 1973 dollars, just over 1 percent of the discounted present value of national income. Larger gains occur if further reform of capital income taxation accompanies the change. We examine the sensitivity of the results, both to the design of the consumption tax and to the values of elasticity and other parameters. The paper also contains estimates of the time required to adjust from one growth path to the other.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49049128497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49049128497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0047-2727(83)90018-X
DO - 10.1016/0047-2727(83)90018-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:49049128497
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 20
SP - 3
EP - 23
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
IS - 1
ER -