Religion, repulsion, and reaction formation: Transforming repellent attractions and repulsions

Dov Cohen, Emily Kim, Nathan W. Hudson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Protestants were more likely than non-Protestants to demonstrate phenomena consistent with the use of reaction formation. Lab experiments showed that when manipulations were designed to produce taboo attractions (to unconventional sexual practices), Protestants instead showed greater repulsion. When implicitly conditioned to produce taboo repulsions (to African Americans), Protestants instead showed greater attraction. Supportive evidence from other studies came from clinicians' judgments, defense mechanism inventories, and a survey of respondent attitudes. Other work showed that Protestants who diminished and displaced threatening affect were more likely to sublimate this affect into creative activities; the present work showed that Protestants who do not or cannot diminish or displace such threatening affect instead reverse it. Traditional individual difference variables showed little ability to predict reaction formation, suggesting that the observed processes go beyond what we normally study when we talk about self-control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)564-584
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Religion
Taboo
defense mechanism
Mercuric Chloride
Aptitude
self-control
Defense Mechanisms
Individuality
African Americans
manipulation
Equipment and Supplies
experiment
ability
evidence
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Defense
  • Reaction formation
  • Religion
  • Repulsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Religion, repulsion, and reaction formation : Transforming repellent attractions and repulsions. / Cohen, Dov; Kim, Emily; Hudson, Nathan W.

In: Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 115, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 564-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9b50ee6f0db42568777000bd395b04c,
title = "Religion, repulsion, and reaction formation: Transforming repellent attractions and repulsions",
abstract = "Protestants were more likely than non-Protestants to demonstrate phenomena consistent with the use of reaction formation. Lab experiments showed that when manipulations were designed to produce taboo attractions (to unconventional sexual practices), Protestants instead showed greater repulsion. When implicitly conditioned to produce taboo repulsions (to African Americans), Protestants instead showed greater attraction. Supportive evidence from other studies came from clinicians' judgments, defense mechanism inventories, and a survey of respondent attitudes. Other work showed that Protestants who diminished and displaced threatening affect were more likely to sublimate this affect into creative activities; the present work showed that Protestants who do not or cannot diminish or displace such threatening affect instead reverse it. Traditional individual difference variables showed little ability to predict reaction formation, suggesting that the observed processes go beyond what we normally study when we talk about self-control.",
keywords = "Culture, Defense, Reaction formation, Religion, Repulsion",
author = "Dov Cohen and Emily Kim and Hudson, {Nathan W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/pspp0000151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "564--584",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religion, repulsion, and reaction formation

T2 - Transforming repellent attractions and repulsions

AU - Cohen, Dov

AU - Kim, Emily

AU - Hudson, Nathan W.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Protestants were more likely than non-Protestants to demonstrate phenomena consistent with the use of reaction formation. Lab experiments showed that when manipulations were designed to produce taboo attractions (to unconventional sexual practices), Protestants instead showed greater repulsion. When implicitly conditioned to produce taboo repulsions (to African Americans), Protestants instead showed greater attraction. Supportive evidence from other studies came from clinicians' judgments, defense mechanism inventories, and a survey of respondent attitudes. Other work showed that Protestants who diminished and displaced threatening affect were more likely to sublimate this affect into creative activities; the present work showed that Protestants who do not or cannot diminish or displace such threatening affect instead reverse it. Traditional individual difference variables showed little ability to predict reaction formation, suggesting that the observed processes go beyond what we normally study when we talk about self-control.

AB - Protestants were more likely than non-Protestants to demonstrate phenomena consistent with the use of reaction formation. Lab experiments showed that when manipulations were designed to produce taboo attractions (to unconventional sexual practices), Protestants instead showed greater repulsion. When implicitly conditioned to produce taboo repulsions (to African Americans), Protestants instead showed greater attraction. Supportive evidence from other studies came from clinicians' judgments, defense mechanism inventories, and a survey of respondent attitudes. Other work showed that Protestants who diminished and displaced threatening affect were more likely to sublimate this affect into creative activities; the present work showed that Protestants who do not or cannot diminish or displace such threatening affect instead reverse it. Traditional individual difference variables showed little ability to predict reaction formation, suggesting that the observed processes go beyond what we normally study when we talk about self-control.

KW - Culture

KW - Defense

KW - Reaction formation

KW - Religion

KW - Repulsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021762616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021762616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pspp0000151

DO - 10.1037/pspp0000151

M3 - Article

C2 - 28604017

AN - SCOPUS:85021762616

VL - 115

SP - 564

EP - 584

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -