The article explores the agreements and disagreements between the author and the authors of Responsible Brains on howneuroscience relates to moral responsibility. The agreements are fundamental: neuroscience is not the harbinger of revolutionary revision of our views ofwhen persons are morally responsible for the harms that they cause. The disagreements are in the details of what is needed for neuroscience to be the helper(rather than the challeger) of the moral sciences.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||16|
|Journal||Criminal Law and Philosophy|
|State||Published - Jul 2022|
ASJC Scopus subject areas