Regulatory Uncertainty and its Effects on Monitoring Activities of a Major Demonstration Project: The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project Case

R. A. Locke, S. E. Greenberg, P. Jagucki, I. G. Krapac, H. Shao

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Regulatory uncertainty is a component of carbon storage projects that can significantly affect project resources and timelines. The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project (IBDP) is a one-million tonne, deep-saline CO2 storage project led by the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) that was initiated before the United States carbon storage regulatory framework was fully developed. To address uncertainty in the evolving regulatory environment, a comprehensive, risk-based, monitoring strategy was used that was expected to be over and above the anticipated new regulatory requirements. Ten years after its initiation, the IBDP has successfully completed the pre-injection and injection phases and is currently in the post-injection site care and monitoring phase. The IBDP experienced two lengthy permitting processes that proved to be the rate-limiting factor for the project, increased the length of time before the project could begin injection, and required additional resources to conduct the project. Future projects are likely to continue to have significant amounts of regulatory uncertainty as their respective project designs and monitoring programs will need to be evaluated by regulators on a case-by-case basis. Operators and regulators alike can benefit from frequent proactive communications during the permitting process in order to significantly reduce the length of the permitting process, maintain the critical safeguards of the Class VI rules, and ultimately meet timely goals for reductions to atmospheric CO2 emissions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5570-5579
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume114
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Event13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2016 - Lausanne, Switzerland
Duration: Nov 14 2016Nov 18 2016

Fingerprint

Demonstrations
Monitoring
Carbon
Communication
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • CO storage
  • Illinois Basin - Decatur Project
  • monitoring
  • permitting
  • regulatory
  • uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Regulatory Uncertainty and its Effects on Monitoring Activities of a Major Demonstration Project : The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project Case. / Locke, R. A.; Greenberg, S. E.; Jagucki, P.; Krapac, I. G.; Shao, H.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 114, 01.01.2017, p. 5570-5579.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{d40cd06230f7456ea4527922c40a2fdf,
title = "Regulatory Uncertainty and its Effects on Monitoring Activities of a Major Demonstration Project: The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project Case",
abstract = "Regulatory uncertainty is a component of carbon storage projects that can significantly affect project resources and timelines. The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project (IBDP) is a one-million tonne, deep-saline CO2 storage project led by the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) that was initiated before the United States carbon storage regulatory framework was fully developed. To address uncertainty in the evolving regulatory environment, a comprehensive, risk-based, monitoring strategy was used that was expected to be over and above the anticipated new regulatory requirements. Ten years after its initiation, the IBDP has successfully completed the pre-injection and injection phases and is currently in the post-injection site care and monitoring phase. The IBDP experienced two lengthy permitting processes that proved to be the rate-limiting factor for the project, increased the length of time before the project could begin injection, and required additional resources to conduct the project. Future projects are likely to continue to have significant amounts of regulatory uncertainty as their respective project designs and monitoring programs will need to be evaluated by regulators on a case-by-case basis. Operators and regulators alike can benefit from frequent proactive communications during the permitting process in order to significantly reduce the length of the permitting process, maintain the critical safeguards of the Class VI rules, and ultimately meet timely goals for reductions to atmospheric CO2 emissions.",
keywords = "CO storage, Illinois Basin - Decatur Project, monitoring, permitting, regulatory, uncertainty",
author = "Locke, {R. A.} and Greenberg, {S. E.} and P. Jagucki and Krapac, {I. G.} and H. Shao",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1697",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "5570--5579",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory Uncertainty and its Effects on Monitoring Activities of a Major Demonstration Project

T2 - The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project Case

AU - Locke, R. A.

AU - Greenberg, S. E.

AU - Jagucki, P.

AU - Krapac, I. G.

AU - Shao, H.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Regulatory uncertainty is a component of carbon storage projects that can significantly affect project resources and timelines. The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project (IBDP) is a one-million tonne, deep-saline CO2 storage project led by the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) that was initiated before the United States carbon storage regulatory framework was fully developed. To address uncertainty in the evolving regulatory environment, a comprehensive, risk-based, monitoring strategy was used that was expected to be over and above the anticipated new regulatory requirements. Ten years after its initiation, the IBDP has successfully completed the pre-injection and injection phases and is currently in the post-injection site care and monitoring phase. The IBDP experienced two lengthy permitting processes that proved to be the rate-limiting factor for the project, increased the length of time before the project could begin injection, and required additional resources to conduct the project. Future projects are likely to continue to have significant amounts of regulatory uncertainty as their respective project designs and monitoring programs will need to be evaluated by regulators on a case-by-case basis. Operators and regulators alike can benefit from frequent proactive communications during the permitting process in order to significantly reduce the length of the permitting process, maintain the critical safeguards of the Class VI rules, and ultimately meet timely goals for reductions to atmospheric CO2 emissions.

AB - Regulatory uncertainty is a component of carbon storage projects that can significantly affect project resources and timelines. The Illinois Basin - Decatur Project (IBDP) is a one-million tonne, deep-saline CO2 storage project led by the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) that was initiated before the United States carbon storage regulatory framework was fully developed. To address uncertainty in the evolving regulatory environment, a comprehensive, risk-based, monitoring strategy was used that was expected to be over and above the anticipated new regulatory requirements. Ten years after its initiation, the IBDP has successfully completed the pre-injection and injection phases and is currently in the post-injection site care and monitoring phase. The IBDP experienced two lengthy permitting processes that proved to be the rate-limiting factor for the project, increased the length of time before the project could begin injection, and required additional resources to conduct the project. Future projects are likely to continue to have significant amounts of regulatory uncertainty as their respective project designs and monitoring programs will need to be evaluated by regulators on a case-by-case basis. Operators and regulators alike can benefit from frequent proactive communications during the permitting process in order to significantly reduce the length of the permitting process, maintain the critical safeguards of the Class VI rules, and ultimately meet timely goals for reductions to atmospheric CO2 emissions.

KW - CO storage

KW - Illinois Basin - Decatur Project

KW - monitoring

KW - permitting

KW - regulatory

KW - uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029658822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029658822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1697

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1697

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85029658822

VL - 114

SP - 5570

EP - 5579

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -