TY - JOUR
T1 - Registry-based prospective, active surveillance of medical-device safety
AU - Resnic, Frederic S.
AU - Majithia, Arjun
AU - Marinac-Dabic, Danica
AU - Robbins, Susan
AU - Semaganda, Henry
AU - Hewitt, Kathleen
AU - Ponirakis, Angelo
AU - Loyo-Berrios, Nilsa
AU - Moussa, Issam
AU - Drozda, Joseph
AU - Normand, Sharon Lise
AU - Matheny, Michael E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants (HHSF contract 223200830058C and U01 FD004963, to Dr. Resnic) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the William M. Wood Foundation; a grant (HHSF contract 223201110172C through the MDEpiNet Methodology Center, to Drs. Resnic and Normand) from the FDA; a grant (U01 FD004493 through the MDEpiNet Medical Counter Measures Study, to Dr. Normand) from the FDA; and grants (VA HSR&D CDA08-020 and VA HSR&D IIR11-292, to Dr. Matheny) from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2017/2/9
Y1 - 2017/2/9
N2 - BACKGROUND The process of assuring the safety of medical devices is constrained by reliance on voluntary reporting of adverse events. We evaluated a strategy of prospective, active surveillance of a national clinical registry to monitor the safety of an implantable vascular-closure device that had a suspected association with increased adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We used an integrated clinical-data surveillance system to conduct a prospective, propensity-matched analysis of the safety of the Mynx vascular-closure device, as compared with alternative approved vascular-closure devices, with data from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. The primary outcome was any vascular complication, which was a composite of access-site bleeding, access- site hematoma, retroperitoneal bleeding, or any vascular complication requiring intervention. Secondary safety end points were access-site bleeding requiring treatment and postprocedural blood transfusion. RESULTS We analyzed data from 73,124 patients who had received Mynx devices after PCI procedures with femoral access from January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2013. The Mynx device was associated with a significantly greater risk of any vascular complication than were alternative vascular-closure devices (absolute risk, 1.2% vs. 0.8%; relative risk, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 1.78; P<0.001); there was also a significantly greater risk of access-site bleeding (absolute risk, 0.4% vs. 0.3%; relative risk, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.62; P = 0.001) and transfusion (absolute risk, 1.8% vs. 1.5%; relative risk, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.34; P<0.001). The initial alerts occurred within the first 12 months of monitoring. Relative risks were greater in three prespecified high-risk subgroups: patients with diabetes, those 70 years of age or older, and women. All safety alerts were confirmed in an independent sample of 48,992 patients from April 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015. CONCLUSIONS A strategy of prospective, active surveillance of a clinical registry rapidly identified potential safety signals among recipients of an implantable vascular-closure device, with initial alerts occurring within the first 12 months of monitoring.
AB - BACKGROUND The process of assuring the safety of medical devices is constrained by reliance on voluntary reporting of adverse events. We evaluated a strategy of prospective, active surveillance of a national clinical registry to monitor the safety of an implantable vascular-closure device that had a suspected association with increased adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We used an integrated clinical-data surveillance system to conduct a prospective, propensity-matched analysis of the safety of the Mynx vascular-closure device, as compared with alternative approved vascular-closure devices, with data from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. The primary outcome was any vascular complication, which was a composite of access-site bleeding, access- site hematoma, retroperitoneal bleeding, or any vascular complication requiring intervention. Secondary safety end points were access-site bleeding requiring treatment and postprocedural blood transfusion. RESULTS We analyzed data from 73,124 patients who had received Mynx devices after PCI procedures with femoral access from January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2013. The Mynx device was associated with a significantly greater risk of any vascular complication than were alternative vascular-closure devices (absolute risk, 1.2% vs. 0.8%; relative risk, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 1.78; P<0.001); there was also a significantly greater risk of access-site bleeding (absolute risk, 0.4% vs. 0.3%; relative risk, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.62; P = 0.001) and transfusion (absolute risk, 1.8% vs. 1.5%; relative risk, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.34; P<0.001). The initial alerts occurred within the first 12 months of monitoring. Relative risks were greater in three prespecified high-risk subgroups: patients with diabetes, those 70 years of age or older, and women. All safety alerts were confirmed in an independent sample of 48,992 patients from April 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015. CONCLUSIONS A strategy of prospective, active surveillance of a clinical registry rapidly identified potential safety signals among recipients of an implantable vascular-closure device, with initial alerts occurring within the first 12 months of monitoring.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012820757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012820757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1516333
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1516333
M3 - Article
C2 - 28121489
AN - SCOPUS:85012820757
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 376
SP - 526
EP - 535
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 6
ER -