Refusing invitations and offers in second language Chinese: Effect of proficiency at the actional and interactional levels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigates the role of proficiency in the development of second language (L2) Chinese learners' ability to negotiate refusals of invitations and offers in conversational interactions. Fifty-four American English learners of L2 Mandarin Chinese at three proficiency levels, and 22 native speakers, completed a four-item naturalized roleplay task. Findings suggest positive effects of proficiency on L1 American English L2 Chinese learners' production of refusals at both actional and interactional levels, though different aspects of their pragmatic competence may not develop in parallel. NSs and learners across proficiency levels had access to a similar range of refusal strategies, but learner production showed a more target-like context-specific combination of refusal strategies with increasing proficiency. The effect of proficiency can also be observed on learners' acquisition of sequential organization of refusals, in terms of delay and discourse patterns, in various context. Nevertheless, it is still unclear at what point along the developmental trajectory learners are sociopragmatically competent enough to show consistent orientation towards the hearer in their refusals as NSs do.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-365
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Politeness Research
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • interaction
  • L2 Chinese
  • pragmatic development
  • proficiency
  • refusals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refusing invitations and offers in second language Chinese: Effect of proficiency at the actional and interactional levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this