Refining the resource model: Cortical competition could explain hemifield independence

John Clevenger, Diane M Beck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A growing number of studies find that we can select independently from the right and left hemifields, prompting some to suggest separate resources in the two hemispheres. Here we report an experiment suggesting that competition between representations, rather than exhaustion of resources, underlies these effects. Subjects searched a briefly displayed array for one of two targets. Subjects were slower to detect a target when it shared a hemifield with the distractors than when the distractors appeared in the opposite hemifield. Importantly however, this only occurred when the array was dense, suggesting that competition, rather than hemifield-specific resources, explains the decrement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1026
Number of pages5
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Resources
Distractor
Experiment
Exhaustion
Hemisphere

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Competition
  • Hemifield effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Refining the resource model : Cortical competition could explain hemifield independence. / Clevenger, John; Beck, Diane M.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 22, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 1022-1026.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97fd3788dc3f4a7a8e8e774e50a7a353,
title = "Refining the resource model: Cortical competition could explain hemifield independence",
abstract = "A growing number of studies find that we can select independently from the right and left hemifields, prompting some to suggest separate resources in the two hemispheres. Here we report an experiment suggesting that competition between representations, rather than exhaustion of resources, underlies these effects. Subjects searched a briefly displayed array for one of two targets. Subjects were slower to detect a target when it shared a hemifield with the distractors than when the distractors appeared in the opposite hemifield. Importantly however, this only occurred when the array was dense, suggesting that competition, rather than hemifield-specific resources, explains the decrement.",
keywords = "Attention, Competition, Hemifield effect",
author = "John Clevenger and Beck, {Diane M}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13506285.2014.960668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1022--1026",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining the resource model

T2 - Cortical competition could explain hemifield independence

AU - Clevenger, John

AU - Beck, Diane M

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - A growing number of studies find that we can select independently from the right and left hemifields, prompting some to suggest separate resources in the two hemispheres. Here we report an experiment suggesting that competition between representations, rather than exhaustion of resources, underlies these effects. Subjects searched a briefly displayed array for one of two targets. Subjects were slower to detect a target when it shared a hemifield with the distractors than when the distractors appeared in the opposite hemifield. Importantly however, this only occurred when the array was dense, suggesting that competition, rather than hemifield-specific resources, explains the decrement.

AB - A growing number of studies find that we can select independently from the right and left hemifields, prompting some to suggest separate resources in the two hemispheres. Here we report an experiment suggesting that competition between representations, rather than exhaustion of resources, underlies these effects. Subjects searched a briefly displayed array for one of two targets. Subjects were slower to detect a target when it shared a hemifield with the distractors than when the distractors appeared in the opposite hemifield. Importantly however, this only occurred when the array was dense, suggesting that competition, rather than hemifield-specific resources, explains the decrement.

KW - Attention

KW - Competition

KW - Hemifield effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84909946969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84909946969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506285.2014.960668

DO - 10.1080/13506285.2014.960668

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84909946969

VL - 22

SP - 1022

EP - 1026

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 8

ER -