TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing an in-group bias in preschool children
T2 - The impact of moral behavior
AU - Hetherington, Chelsea
AU - Hendrickson, Caroline
AU - Koenig, Melissa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - How impressionable are in-group biases in early childhood? Previous research shows that young children display robust preferences for members of their own social group, but also condemn those who harm others. The current study investigates children's evaluations of agents when their group membership and moral behavior conflict. After being assigned to a minimal group, 4- to 5-year-old children either saw their in-group member behave antisocially, an out-group member act prosocially, or control agents, for whom moral information was removed. Children's explicit preference for and willingness to share with their in-group member was significantly attenuated in the presence of an antisocial in-group member, but not a prosocial out-group member. Interestingly, children's learning decisions were unmoved by a person's moral behavior, instead being consistently guided by group membership. This demonstrates that children's in-group bias is remarkably flexible: while moral information curbs children's in-group bias on social evaluations, social learning is still driven by group information. How impressionable are in-group biases in early childhood? Previous research shows that children display robust preferences for members of their own social group, but also condemn those who harm others. The current study investigates children's evaluations of agents when their group membership and moral behavior come into conflict. Results highlight the remarkable flexibility of children's in-group bias: while moral information curbed this bias on explicit social evaluations, children's selective learning decisions were still driven by group information.
AB - How impressionable are in-group biases in early childhood? Previous research shows that young children display robust preferences for members of their own social group, but also condemn those who harm others. The current study investigates children's evaluations of agents when their group membership and moral behavior conflict. After being assigned to a minimal group, 4- to 5-year-old children either saw their in-group member behave antisocially, an out-group member act prosocially, or control agents, for whom moral information was removed. Children's explicit preference for and willingness to share with their in-group member was significantly attenuated in the presence of an antisocial in-group member, but not a prosocial out-group member. Interestingly, children's learning decisions were unmoved by a person's moral behavior, instead being consistently guided by group membership. This demonstrates that children's in-group bias is remarkably flexible: while moral information curbs children's in-group bias on social evaluations, social learning is still driven by group information. How impressionable are in-group biases in early childhood? Previous research shows that children display robust preferences for members of their own social group, but also condemn those who harm others. The current study investigates children's evaluations of agents when their group membership and moral behavior come into conflict. Results highlight the remarkable flexibility of children's in-group bias: while moral information curbed this bias on explicit social evaluations, children's selective learning decisions were still driven by group information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931837297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931837297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/desc.12192
DO - 10.1111/desc.12192
M3 - Article
C2 - 24836151
AN - SCOPUS:84931837297
SN - 1363-755X
VL - 17
SP - 1042
EP - 1049
JO - Developmental science
JF - Developmental science
IS - 6
ER -