TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstruction-Aware Imaging System Ranking by Use of a Sparsity-Driven Numerical Observer Enabled by Variational Bayesian Inference
AU - Chen, Yujia
AU - Lou, Yang
AU - Wang, Kun
AU - Kupinski, Matthew A.
AU - Anastasio, Mark A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received September 18, 2018; revised November 5, 2018; accepted November 7, 2018. Date of publication November 21, 2018; date of current version May 1, 2019. This work was supported in part by NIH under Grant EB020168, Grant NS102213-02, and Grant EB020604, and in part by NSF under Grant DMS1614305. (Corresponding author: Mark A. Anastasio.) Y. Chen, Y. Lou, and M. A. Anastasio are with the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA (e-mail: chen.yujia@wustl.edu; louy@wustl.edu; anastasio@wustl.edu). K. Wang is with Google, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 USA.
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by NIH under Grant EB020168, Grant NS102213-02, and Grant EB020604, and in part by NSF under Grant DMS1614305.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - It is widely accepted that optimization of imaging system performance should be guided by task-based measures of image quality. It has been advocated that imaging hardware or data-acquisition designs should be optimized by use of an ideal observer that exploits full statistical knowledge of the measurement noise and class of objects to be imaged, without consideration of the reconstruction method. In practice, accurate and tractable models of the complete object statistics are often difficult to determine. Moreover, in imaging systems that employ compressive sensing concepts, imaging hardware and sparse image reconstruction are innately coupled technologies. In this paper, a sparsity-driven observer (SDO) that can be employed to optimize hardware by use of a stochastic object model describing object sparsity is described and investigated. The SDO and sparse reconstruction method can, therefore, be "matched" in the sense that they both utilize the same statistical information regarding the class of objects to be imaged. To efficiently compute the SDO test statistic, computational tools developed recently for variational Bayesian inference with sparse linear models are adopted. The use of the SDO to rank data-acquisition designs in a stylized example as motivated by magnetic resonance imaging is demonstrated. This paper reveals that the SDO can produce rankings that are consistent with visual assessments of the reconstructed images but different from those produced by use of the traditionally employed Hotelling observer.
AB - It is widely accepted that optimization of imaging system performance should be guided by task-based measures of image quality. It has been advocated that imaging hardware or data-acquisition designs should be optimized by use of an ideal observer that exploits full statistical knowledge of the measurement noise and class of objects to be imaged, without consideration of the reconstruction method. In practice, accurate and tractable models of the complete object statistics are often difficult to determine. Moreover, in imaging systems that employ compressive sensing concepts, imaging hardware and sparse image reconstruction are innately coupled technologies. In this paper, a sparsity-driven observer (SDO) that can be employed to optimize hardware by use of a stochastic object model describing object sparsity is described and investigated. The SDO and sparse reconstruction method can, therefore, be "matched" in the sense that they both utilize the same statistical information regarding the class of objects to be imaged. To efficiently compute the SDO test statistic, computational tools developed recently for variational Bayesian inference with sparse linear models are adopted. The use of the SDO to rank data-acquisition designs in a stylized example as motivated by magnetic resonance imaging is demonstrated. This paper reveals that the SDO can produce rankings that are consistent with visual assessments of the reconstructed images but different from those produced by use of the traditionally employed Hotelling observer.
KW - Task-based image quality assessment
KW - ideal observer computation
KW - imaging system optimization
KW - sparse image reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057207551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057207551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMI.2018.2880870
DO - 10.1109/TMI.2018.2880870
M3 - Article
C2 - 30475713
AN - SCOPUS:85057207551
SN - 0278-0062
VL - 38
SP - 1251
EP - 1262
JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
IS - 5
M1 - 8542729
ER -