TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling Opposing Effects of Emotion on Relational Memory
T2 - Behavioral, Eye-Tracking, and Brain Imaging Investigations
AU - Bogdan, Paul C.
AU - Dolcos, Florin
AU - Katsumi, Yuta
AU - O’Brien, Margaret
AU - Iordan, Alexandru D.
AU - Iwinski, Samantha
AU - Buetti, Simona
AU - Lleras, Alejandro
AU - Bost, Kelly Freeman
AU - Dolcos, Sanda
N1 - This research was carried out in part at the University of Illinois\u2019 Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and was supported by research funds awarded to Florin Dolcos, Sanda Dolcos, and Kelly Freeman Bost. During the preparation of this article, Paul C. Bogdan was supported by a Predoctoral Fellowship provided by the Beckman Foundation and a Dissertation Completion Fellowship from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Florin Dolcos was supported by an Emanuel Donchin Professorial Scholarship in Psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Participants from Study 3 were recruited from a larger study investigating mother\u2013child dyads during early child development, which was supported in part by grants from the DairyGen Council of Canadian Dairy Network, National Dairy Council (awarded to Sharon Donovan and Barbara H. Fiese), the Gerber Foundation (awarded to Sharon Donovan), the Christopher Family Foundation (awarded to Sharon Donovan and Kelly Freeman Bost), the US Department of Agriculture\u2019s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch Project No. 793-330, awarded to Barbara H. Fiese, Kelly Freeman Bost, and Margarita Teran-Garcia), and the National Institutes of Health (Grant DK107561, awarded to Sharon Donovan).
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The effects of emotion on memory are wide-ranging and powerful, but they are not uniform. Although there is agreement that emotion enhances memory for individual items, how it influences memory for the associated contextual details (relational memory, RM) remains debated. The prevalent view suggests that emotion impairs RM, but there is also evidence that emotion enhances RM. To reconcile these diverging results, we carried out three studies incorporating the following features: (1) testing RM with increased specificity, distinguishing between subjective (recollection based) and objective (item–context match) RM accuracy, (2) accounting for emotion–attention interactions via eye-tracking and task manipulation, and (3) using stimuli with integrated item–context content. Challenging the prevalent view, we identified both enhancing and impairing effects. First, emotion enhanced subjective RM, separately and when confirmed by accurate objective RM. Second, emotion impaired objective RM through attention capturing, but it enhanced RM accuracy when attentional effects were statistically accounted for using eye-tracking data. Third, emotion also enhanced RM when participants were cued to focus on contextual details during encoding, likely by increasing item–context binding. Finally, functional magnetic resonance imaging data recorded from a subset of participants showed that emotional enhancement of RM was associated with increased activity in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, along with increased intra-MTL and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex–MTL functional connectivity. Overall, these findings reconcile evidence regarding opposing effects of emotion on RM and point to possible training interventions to increase RM specificity in healthy functioning, posttraumatic stress disorder, and aging, by promoting item–context binding and diminishing memory decontextualization.
AB - The effects of emotion on memory are wide-ranging and powerful, but they are not uniform. Although there is agreement that emotion enhances memory for individual items, how it influences memory for the associated contextual details (relational memory, RM) remains debated. The prevalent view suggests that emotion impairs RM, but there is also evidence that emotion enhances RM. To reconcile these diverging results, we carried out three studies incorporating the following features: (1) testing RM with increased specificity, distinguishing between subjective (recollection based) and objective (item–context match) RM accuracy, (2) accounting for emotion–attention interactions via eye-tracking and task manipulation, and (3) using stimuli with integrated item–context content. Challenging the prevalent view, we identified both enhancing and impairing effects. First, emotion enhanced subjective RM, separately and when confirmed by accurate objective RM. Second, emotion impaired objective RM through attention capturing, but it enhanced RM accuracy when attentional effects were statistically accounted for using eye-tracking data. Third, emotion also enhanced RM when participants were cued to focus on contextual details during encoding, likely by increasing item–context binding. Finally, functional magnetic resonance imaging data recorded from a subset of participants showed that emotional enhancement of RM was associated with increased activity in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, along with increased intra-MTL and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex–MTL functional connectivity. Overall, these findings reconcile evidence regarding opposing effects of emotion on RM and point to possible training interventions to increase RM specificity in healthy functioning, posttraumatic stress disorder, and aging, by promoting item–context binding and diminishing memory decontextualization.
KW - arousal
KW - associative memory
KW - contextual memory
KW - functional magnetic resonance imaging
KW - recollection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205379416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205379416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/xge0001625
DO - 10.1037/xge0001625
M3 - Article
C2 - 39298200
AN - SCOPUS:85205379416
SN - 0096-3445
VL - 153
SP - 3074
EP - 3106
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
IS - 12
ER -