TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognition of Poly-Ubiquitins by the Proteasome through Protein Refolding Guided by Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Interactions
AU - Zhang, Yi
AU - Vuković, Lela
AU - Rudack, Till
AU - Han, Wei
AU - Schulten, Klaus
N1 - We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Kylie Walters for data from NMR experiments conducted in her laboratory and Dr. Eri Sakata for useful discussions. This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grants PHY0822613 and PHY1430124 as well as by National Institutes of Health (NIH)grant 9P41GM104601.
PY - 2016/8/25
Y1 - 2016/8/25
N2 - Specificity of protein degradation by cellular proteasomes comes from tetra-ubiquitin recognition. We carry out molecular dynamics simulations to characterize how the ubiquitin receptor Rpn10 recognizes in the 26S proteasome K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin. In the binding pose, ubiquitin and Rpn10 interact primarily through hydrophobic patches. However, K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin mostly assumes a closed form in solution prior to binding, in which its hydrophobic patches are not exposed to solvent. Likewise, the hydrophobic ubiquitin interacting motifs (UIMs) of Rpn10 are mostly protected prior to binding. As a result, ubiquitin recognition in the proteasome requires refolding of both K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin and Rpn10. Simulations suggest that conserved complementary electrostatic patterns of Rpn10 and ubiquitins guide protein association (stage 1 in the recognition process), which induces refolding (stage 2), and then facilitates formation of hydrophobic contacts (stage 3). The simulations also explain why Rpn10 has a higher affinity for K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin than for mono-ubiquitin and K48-linked di- and tri-ubiquitins. Simulation results expand on the current view that the flexible arm of Rpn10 acts as an extended fragment of α-helices and flexible coils in the recognition process.
AB - Specificity of protein degradation by cellular proteasomes comes from tetra-ubiquitin recognition. We carry out molecular dynamics simulations to characterize how the ubiquitin receptor Rpn10 recognizes in the 26S proteasome K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin. In the binding pose, ubiquitin and Rpn10 interact primarily through hydrophobic patches. However, K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin mostly assumes a closed form in solution prior to binding, in which its hydrophobic patches are not exposed to solvent. Likewise, the hydrophobic ubiquitin interacting motifs (UIMs) of Rpn10 are mostly protected prior to binding. As a result, ubiquitin recognition in the proteasome requires refolding of both K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin and Rpn10. Simulations suggest that conserved complementary electrostatic patterns of Rpn10 and ubiquitins guide protein association (stage 1 in the recognition process), which induces refolding (stage 2), and then facilitates formation of hydrophobic contacts (stage 3). The simulations also explain why Rpn10 has a higher affinity for K48-linked tetra-ubiquitin than for mono-ubiquitin and K48-linked di- and tri-ubiquitins. Simulation results expand on the current view that the flexible arm of Rpn10 acts as an extended fragment of α-helices and flexible coils in the recognition process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984614236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984614236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01327
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01327
M3 - Article
C2 - 27012670
AN - SCOPUS:84984614236
SN - 1520-6106
VL - 120
SP - 8137
EP - 8146
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
IS - 33
ER -