Reading against the grain

Examining the status of the categories of class and tradition in the scholarship of British cultural studies in light of contemporary popular culture and literature

Cameron R McCarthy, Jennifer Logue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article addresses the turbulent relationship that British cultural studies scholars have with the concepts of 'class' and 'tradition' and the problematic status of these key terms within the cultural studies literature. The authors maintain, in part, that these concepts have been deployed within a center-periphery thesis and a field-bound ethnographic framework by cultural studies scholars pursuing a sub-cultural studies approach. Within this framework, 'Britishness' has been the silent organizing principle defining metropolitan working-class traditions and forms of cultural resistance. British cultural studies proponents have therefore pursued the study of class and culture as a localized, nation-bound set of interests. This has placed cultural studies in tension with postcolonial subjectivities. The authors write against the grain of the textual production of the working class within cultural studies scholarship, insisting that recent films and literary works offer a more complex story of class identities in the age of globalization and transnationalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-160
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy Futures in Education
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 20 2009

Fingerprint

popular culture
cultural studies
agricultural product
working class
cultural studies approach
center-periphery
subjectivity
literature
globalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{3b09e95520eb4ab88c693bad49bbdf32,
title = "Reading against the grain: Examining the status of the categories of class and tradition in the scholarship of British cultural studies in light of contemporary popular culture and literature",
abstract = "This article addresses the turbulent relationship that British cultural studies scholars have with the concepts of 'class' and 'tradition' and the problematic status of these key terms within the cultural studies literature. The authors maintain, in part, that these concepts have been deployed within a center-periphery thesis and a field-bound ethnographic framework by cultural studies scholars pursuing a sub-cultural studies approach. Within this framework, 'Britishness' has been the silent organizing principle defining metropolitan working-class traditions and forms of cultural resistance. British cultural studies proponents have therefore pursued the study of class and culture as a localized, nation-bound set of interests. This has placed cultural studies in tension with postcolonial subjectivities. The authors write against the grain of the textual production of the working class within cultural studies scholarship, insisting that recent films and literary works offer a more complex story of class identities in the age of globalization and transnationalism.",
author = "McCarthy, {Cameron R} and Jennifer Logue",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.2304/pfie.2009.7.2.145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "145--160",
journal = "Policy Futures in Education",
issn = "1478-2103",
publisher = "Symposium Journals Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reading against the grain

T2 - Examining the status of the categories of class and tradition in the scholarship of British cultural studies in light of contemporary popular culture and literature

AU - McCarthy, Cameron R

AU - Logue, Jennifer

PY - 2009/8/20

Y1 - 2009/8/20

N2 - This article addresses the turbulent relationship that British cultural studies scholars have with the concepts of 'class' and 'tradition' and the problematic status of these key terms within the cultural studies literature. The authors maintain, in part, that these concepts have been deployed within a center-periphery thesis and a field-bound ethnographic framework by cultural studies scholars pursuing a sub-cultural studies approach. Within this framework, 'Britishness' has been the silent organizing principle defining metropolitan working-class traditions and forms of cultural resistance. British cultural studies proponents have therefore pursued the study of class and culture as a localized, nation-bound set of interests. This has placed cultural studies in tension with postcolonial subjectivities. The authors write against the grain of the textual production of the working class within cultural studies scholarship, insisting that recent films and literary works offer a more complex story of class identities in the age of globalization and transnationalism.

AB - This article addresses the turbulent relationship that British cultural studies scholars have with the concepts of 'class' and 'tradition' and the problematic status of these key terms within the cultural studies literature. The authors maintain, in part, that these concepts have been deployed within a center-periphery thesis and a field-bound ethnographic framework by cultural studies scholars pursuing a sub-cultural studies approach. Within this framework, 'Britishness' has been the silent organizing principle defining metropolitan working-class traditions and forms of cultural resistance. British cultural studies proponents have therefore pursued the study of class and culture as a localized, nation-bound set of interests. This has placed cultural studies in tension with postcolonial subjectivities. The authors write against the grain of the textual production of the working class within cultural studies scholarship, insisting that recent films and literary works offer a more complex story of class identities in the age of globalization and transnationalism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749122332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749122332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.2.145

DO - 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.2.145

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 145

EP - 160

JO - Policy Futures in Education

JF - Policy Futures in Education

SN - 1478-2103

IS - 2

ER -