Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology. Expanding the scope of investigation

Melissa A Bowles, Ronald P. Leow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study addresses the reactivity of two types of verbal protocols in SLA research. It expands on the work of Leow and Morgan-Short (2004), who found nonmetalinguistic verbalization during a second-language reading task to be nonreactive for beginning learners' text comprehension, intake, and production of the targeted morphological form. The present study investigated the reactivity of both metalinguistic and nonmetalinguistic protocols, using a syntactic structure and advanced language learners of Spanish. Results indicated that neither type of verbalization significantly affected text comprehension or written production of old or new exemplars of the targeted structure when compared to a control group, although metalinguistic verbalization appeared to cause a significant decrease in text comprehension over nonmetalinguistic verbalization. Furthermore, both types of verbalization significantly increased the amount of time on task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-440
Number of pages26
JournalStudies in Second Language Acquisition
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology. Expanding the scope of investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this