Re-making the middle: Dis-intermediation in international context

Christopher Lubienski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent reforms in England's education system have been justified on the grounds that other countries have pursued similar approaches to education reform. Many such policies that by-pass or otherwise diminish meso-level institutions demonstrate a commitment to the idea of devolving authority to local actors. The current reforms in England and elsewhere reconfigure governance structures to diminish intermediate-level institutions on the grounds that these reforms lead to more effective and equitable educational systems. But in lieu of compelling evidence of such an impact, it appears that such policies are often instead simply a political attack on meso-level authorities, and may in fact represent an opportunity for new policy players to occupy the space left by receding meso-level institutions. This article surveys some of the specific policies that have emerged from recent policy trends, particularly those that have undercut established intermediate-level institutions in the USA and New Zealand. Reviewing the empirical record from these cases, I argue that, rather than simply devolving power away from intermediate authorities to local actors in order to produce more effective or equitable outcomes, many of these reforms have been more successful instead in creating the conditions in which new, non-state actors are able to accrue policy power for themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-440
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Management Administration and Leadership
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

meso level
reform
educational system
education system
New Zealand
Intermediation
commitment
governance
trend
evidence
education
Authority
England

Keywords

  • administration
  • leadership
  • management
  • schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Re-making the middle : Dis-intermediation in international context. / Lubienski, Christopher.

In: Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Vol. 42, No. 3, 05.2014, p. 423-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{516900cb2f8849af838f4d901e4d633f,
title = "Re-making the middle: Dis-intermediation in international context",
abstract = "Recent reforms in England's education system have been justified on the grounds that other countries have pursued similar approaches to education reform. Many such policies that by-pass or otherwise diminish meso-level institutions demonstrate a commitment to the idea of devolving authority to local actors. The current reforms in England and elsewhere reconfigure governance structures to diminish intermediate-level institutions on the grounds that these reforms lead to more effective and equitable educational systems. But in lieu of compelling evidence of such an impact, it appears that such policies are often instead simply a political attack on meso-level authorities, and may in fact represent an opportunity for new policy players to occupy the space left by receding meso-level institutions. This article surveys some of the specific policies that have emerged from recent policy trends, particularly those that have undercut established intermediate-level institutions in the USA and New Zealand. Reviewing the empirical record from these cases, I argue that, rather than simply devolving power away from intermediate authorities to local actors in order to produce more effective or equitable outcomes, many of these reforms have been more successful instead in creating the conditions in which new, non-state actors are able to accrue policy power for themselves.",
keywords = "administration, leadership, management, schools",
author = "Christopher Lubienski",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1741143214521594",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "423--440",
journal = "Educational Management Administration and Leadership",
issn = "1741-1432",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-making the middle

T2 - Dis-intermediation in international context

AU - Lubienski, Christopher

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Recent reforms in England's education system have been justified on the grounds that other countries have pursued similar approaches to education reform. Many such policies that by-pass or otherwise diminish meso-level institutions demonstrate a commitment to the idea of devolving authority to local actors. The current reforms in England and elsewhere reconfigure governance structures to diminish intermediate-level institutions on the grounds that these reforms lead to more effective and equitable educational systems. But in lieu of compelling evidence of such an impact, it appears that such policies are often instead simply a political attack on meso-level authorities, and may in fact represent an opportunity for new policy players to occupy the space left by receding meso-level institutions. This article surveys some of the specific policies that have emerged from recent policy trends, particularly those that have undercut established intermediate-level institutions in the USA and New Zealand. Reviewing the empirical record from these cases, I argue that, rather than simply devolving power away from intermediate authorities to local actors in order to produce more effective or equitable outcomes, many of these reforms have been more successful instead in creating the conditions in which new, non-state actors are able to accrue policy power for themselves.

AB - Recent reforms in England's education system have been justified on the grounds that other countries have pursued similar approaches to education reform. Many such policies that by-pass or otherwise diminish meso-level institutions demonstrate a commitment to the idea of devolving authority to local actors. The current reforms in England and elsewhere reconfigure governance structures to diminish intermediate-level institutions on the grounds that these reforms lead to more effective and equitable educational systems. But in lieu of compelling evidence of such an impact, it appears that such policies are often instead simply a political attack on meso-level authorities, and may in fact represent an opportunity for new policy players to occupy the space left by receding meso-level institutions. This article surveys some of the specific policies that have emerged from recent policy trends, particularly those that have undercut established intermediate-level institutions in the USA and New Zealand. Reviewing the empirical record from these cases, I argue that, rather than simply devolving power away from intermediate authorities to local actors in order to produce more effective or equitable outcomes, many of these reforms have been more successful instead in creating the conditions in which new, non-state actors are able to accrue policy power for themselves.

KW - administration

KW - leadership

KW - management

KW - schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900451469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900451469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1741143214521594

DO - 10.1177/1741143214521594

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84900451469

VL - 42

SP - 423

EP - 440

JO - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

JF - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

SN - 1741-1432

IS - 3

ER -