Radical hope in revolting times: Proposing a culturally relevant psychological framework

Della V. Mosley, Helen A. Neville, Nayeli Y. Chavez-Dueñas, Hector Y. Adames, Jioni A. Lewis, Bryana H. French

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Growing research supports the link between individual expressions of hope and psychological well-being. In this paper, we draw on psychological theories of hope, racial and ethnic studies, and the literature on radical healing to propose a framework of radical hope. Although the proposed multidimensional framework integrates cultural practices of People of Color in the United States, it is flexible enough to be adapted to other contexts. The paper begins by providing a brief review of the literature that conceptualizes the concept of hope in the field of psychology as a prelude to comparing the concept to the interdisciplinary notion of radical hope. Based on this body of work, we then introduce a culturally relevant psychological framework of radical hope, which includes the components of collective memory as well as faith and agency. Both components require an orientation to one of four directions including individual orientation, collective orientation, past orientation, and future orientation. The framework also consists of pathways individuals can follow to experience radical hope including (a) understanding the history of oppression along with the actions of resistance taken to transform these conditions, (b) embracing ancestral pride, (c) envisioning equitable possibilities, and (d) creating meaning and purpose in life by adopting an orientation to social justice. We conclude with a proposed research agenda for radical hope.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12512
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radical hope in revolting times: Proposing a culturally relevant psychological framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this