TY - JOUR
T1 - RACORO continental boundary layer cloud investigations
T2 - 2. large-eddy simulations of cumulus clouds and evaluation with in situ and ground-based observations
AU - Endo, Satoshi
AU - Fridlind, Ann M.
AU - Lin, Wuyin
AU - Vogelmann, Andrew M.
AU - Toto, Tami
AU - Ackerman, Andrews
AU - McFarquhar, Greg M.
AU - Jackson, Robert C.
AU - Jonsson, Haflidi H.
AU - Liu, Yangang
N1 - This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research Program under the Earth System Modeling Program via the FASTER Project (http://www.bnl.gov/ faster/) and the Atmospheric System Research Program via DE-SC00112704. Observational data sets were obtained from the U.S. Department of Energy ARM Climate Research Facility (https:// www.arm.gov/) and Oklahoma Mesonet (https://www.mesonet.org/). Processed forcing and observational data sets used for the 3 day case study are also aggregated as an ARM PI data product (http://iop.archive.arm.gov/ arm-iop/0pi-data/vogelmann/racoro/ case_studies). The research utilized resources at the New York Center for Computational Sciences. Authors appreciate Marat Khairoutdinov for his helpful comments on LES configurations, Kwinten Van Weverberg and Hugh Morrison for providing and helping to use the two-moment microphysics scheme, and Peter Blossey for providing the interface to RRTM radiation scheme in WRF-FASTER.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - A 60 h case study of continental boundary layer cumulus clouds is examined using two large-eddy simulation (LES) models. The case is based on observations obtained during the RACORO Campaign (Routine Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Aerial Facility (AAF) Clouds with Low Optical Water Depths (CLOWD) Optical Radiative Observations) at the ARM Climate Research Facility’s Southern Great Plains site. The LES models are driven by continuous large-scale and surface forcings and are constrained by multimodal and temporally varying aerosol number size distribution profiles derived from aircraft observations. We compare simulated cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties with ground-based remote sensing and aircraft observations. The LES simulations capture the observed transitions of the evolving cumulus-topped boundary layers during the three daytime periods and generally reproduce variations of droplet number concentration with liquid water content (LWC), corresponding to the gradient between the cloud centers and cloud edges at given heights. The observed LWC values fall within the range of simulated values; the observed droplet number concentrations are commonly higher than simulated, but differences remain on par with potential estimation errors in the aircraft measurements. Sensitivity studies examine the influences of bin microphysics versus bulk microphysics, aerosol advection, supersaturation treatment, and aerosol hygroscopicity. Simulated macrophysical cloud properties are found to be insensitive in this nonprecipitating case, but microphysical properties are especially sensitive to bulk microphysics supersaturation treatment and aerosol hygroscopicity.
AB - A 60 h case study of continental boundary layer cumulus clouds is examined using two large-eddy simulation (LES) models. The case is based on observations obtained during the RACORO Campaign (Routine Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Aerial Facility (AAF) Clouds with Low Optical Water Depths (CLOWD) Optical Radiative Observations) at the ARM Climate Research Facility’s Southern Great Plains site. The LES models are driven by continuous large-scale and surface forcings and are constrained by multimodal and temporally varying aerosol number size distribution profiles derived from aircraft observations. We compare simulated cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties with ground-based remote sensing and aircraft observations. The LES simulations capture the observed transitions of the evolving cumulus-topped boundary layers during the three daytime periods and generally reproduce variations of droplet number concentration with liquid water content (LWC), corresponding to the gradient between the cloud centers and cloud edges at given heights. The observed LWC values fall within the range of simulated values; the observed droplet number concentrations are commonly higher than simulated, but differences remain on par with potential estimation errors in the aircraft measurements. Sensitivity studies examine the influences of bin microphysics versus bulk microphysics, aerosol advection, supersaturation treatment, and aerosol hygroscopicity. Simulated macrophysical cloud properties are found to be insensitive in this nonprecipitating case, but microphysical properties are especially sensitive to bulk microphysics supersaturation treatment and aerosol hygroscopicity.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84955633916
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84955633916#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/2014JD022525
DO - 10.1002/2014JD022525
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84955633916
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 120
SP - 5993
EP - 6014
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research
IS - 12
ER -