Race and the Law in the Genomic Age: A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law

Robin Bradley Kar, John Lindo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This is the “Age of Genomics”, and yet people who study race and the law often resist integrating biological insights into their understanding of human psychology and behavior. The historical reasons for this resistance are understandable, but the biological sciences have been going through a recent renaissance, which creates a contemporary problem of translation. This chapter explains why the appropriate response of the law to recent developments in the evolutionary and biological sciences is to recognize that there is more, rather than less, cause for concern with respect to how racial concepts typically function in the law. The short reason is twofold. First, belief in race is prone to function in ways that are far more prejudicial than probative of most issues relevant to criminal or civil liability. Second, racial concepts function automatically and unconsciously, often without racial animus or discriminatory intent. Hence, current equal protection doctrine, which requires a finding of discriminatory intent and is the central mechanism for guaranteeing the equal treatment of persons under the law, is poorly suited to make that guarantee.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology
EditorsRoger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, Karen Yeung
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages874
StatePublished - 2017

Publication series

NameOxford Handbooks

Fingerprint

equal treatment
Law
science
Renaissance
liability
doctrine
guarantee
psychology
cause
human being

Keywords

  • race
  • genetics
  • genomics
  • wade
  • racism
  • folk biology
  • evolutionary psychology
  • equal protection
  • affirmative action
  • evolution
  • unconscious racism
  • implicit bias
  • inequality
  • in-group
  • out-group
  • biology
  • population genetics
  • y-haplogroup

Cite this

Kar, R. B., & Lindo, J. (2017). Race and the Law in the Genomic Age: A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law. In R. Brownsword, E. Scotford, & K. Yeung (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology (pp. 874). (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford University Press.

Race and the Law in the Genomic Age : A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law. / Kar, Robin Bradley; Lindo, John.

The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology. ed. / Roger Brownsword; Eloise Scotford; Karen Yeung. Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 874 (Oxford Handbooks).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kar, RB & Lindo, J 2017, Race and the Law in the Genomic Age: A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law. in R Brownsword, E Scotford & K Yeung (eds), The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford University Press, pp. 874.
Kar RB, Lindo J. Race and the Law in the Genomic Age: A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law. In Brownsword R, Scotford E, Yeung K, editors, The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology. Oxford University Press. 2017. p. 874. (Oxford Handbooks).
Kar, Robin Bradley ; Lindo, John. / Race and the Law in the Genomic Age : A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law. The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology. editor / Roger Brownsword ; Eloise Scotford ; Karen Yeung. Oxford University Press, 2017. pp. 874 (Oxford Handbooks).
@inbook{56e5657fb8844ee689e6ba1f7728e0f8,
title = "Race and the Law in the Genomic Age: A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law",
abstract = "This is the “Age of Genomics”, and yet people who study race and the law often resist integrating biological insights into their understanding of human psychology and behavior. The historical reasons for this resistance are understandable, but the biological sciences have been going through a recent renaissance, which creates a contemporary problem of translation. This chapter explains why the appropriate response of the law to recent developments in the evolutionary and biological sciences is to recognize that there is more, rather than less, cause for concern with respect to how racial concepts typically function in the law. The short reason is twofold. First, belief in race is prone to function in ways that are far more prejudicial than probative of most issues relevant to criminal or civil liability. Second, racial concepts function automatically and unconsciously, often without racial animus or discriminatory intent. Hence, current equal protection doctrine, which requires a finding of discriminatory intent and is the central mechanism for guaranteeing the equal treatment of persons under the law, is poorly suited to make that guarantee.",
keywords = "race, genetics, genomics, wade, racism, folk biology, evolutionary psychology, equal protection, affirmative action, evolution, unconscious racism, implicit bias, inequality, in-group, out-group, biology, population genetics, y-haplogroup",
author = "Kar, {Robin Bradley} and John Lindo",
year = "2017",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Oxford Handbooks",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "874",
editor = "Roger Brownsword and Eloise Scotford and Karen Yeung",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Race and the Law in the Genomic Age

T2 - A Problem for Equal Treatment Under the Law

AU - Kar, Robin Bradley

AU - Lindo, John

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This is the “Age of Genomics”, and yet people who study race and the law often resist integrating biological insights into their understanding of human psychology and behavior. The historical reasons for this resistance are understandable, but the biological sciences have been going through a recent renaissance, which creates a contemporary problem of translation. This chapter explains why the appropriate response of the law to recent developments in the evolutionary and biological sciences is to recognize that there is more, rather than less, cause for concern with respect to how racial concepts typically function in the law. The short reason is twofold. First, belief in race is prone to function in ways that are far more prejudicial than probative of most issues relevant to criminal or civil liability. Second, racial concepts function automatically and unconsciously, often without racial animus or discriminatory intent. Hence, current equal protection doctrine, which requires a finding of discriminatory intent and is the central mechanism for guaranteeing the equal treatment of persons under the law, is poorly suited to make that guarantee.

AB - This is the “Age of Genomics”, and yet people who study race and the law often resist integrating biological insights into their understanding of human psychology and behavior. The historical reasons for this resistance are understandable, but the biological sciences have been going through a recent renaissance, which creates a contemporary problem of translation. This chapter explains why the appropriate response of the law to recent developments in the evolutionary and biological sciences is to recognize that there is more, rather than less, cause for concern with respect to how racial concepts typically function in the law. The short reason is twofold. First, belief in race is prone to function in ways that are far more prejudicial than probative of most issues relevant to criminal or civil liability. Second, racial concepts function automatically and unconsciously, often without racial animus or discriminatory intent. Hence, current equal protection doctrine, which requires a finding of discriminatory intent and is the central mechanism for guaranteeing the equal treatment of persons under the law, is poorly suited to make that guarantee.

KW - race

KW - genetics

KW - genomics

KW - wade

KW - racism

KW - folk biology

KW - evolutionary psychology

KW - equal protection

KW - affirmative action

KW - evolution

KW - unconscious racism

KW - implicit bias

KW - inequality

KW - in-group

KW - out-group

KW - biology

KW - population genetics

KW - y-haplogroup

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Oxford Handbooks

SP - 874

BT - The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation, and Technology

A2 - Brownsword, Roger

A2 - Scotford, Eloise

A2 - Yeung, Karen

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -