TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the geographic distribution of building coverage across the US for urban sustainability studies
AU - Soliman, A.
AU - Mackay, A.
AU - Schmidt, A.
AU - Allan, B.
AU - Wang, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding support from the Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment (iSEE) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Insightful comments and feedback received from anonymous reviewers and members of the CyberInfrastructure and Geospatial Information Laboratory were greatly appreciated.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - The geographic distribution of building coverage is an important factor when evaluating the potential for green infrastructure and other sustainable development practices. However, comprehensive building coverage datasets are not available for many urban communities. We predicted the distribution of building coverage ratio across the contiguous United States (CONUS) at the scale of census block group using a bootstrap strategy applied to a nonlinear mixed effects model. Building footprints from 12 metropolitan areas were examined for completeness and aggregated at the level of U.S. census block groups (n = 19,109) and used to train the model. The best predictive model included both the percentage of the impervious surface area and housing unit density as nonlinear fixed effects in the form of a multivariate power function. Urban-type class, defined by median construction year of housing units and land use composition, were included in the model as a random effect. Cross-validation indicated that the selected model has a mean error of 0.049% (95% CI 0.047 and 0.051) of the estimated proportion of block group land area represented by building coverage. Adopting a bootstrapping strategy allowed selection of a subset with a minimum distance between samples to avoid spatial autocorrelation of residuals, while repeating the sampling for 1000 iterations to estimate the confidence intervals of the model parameters. Results are provided as open access data which quantify the geographical distribution of building coverage in terms of the ensemble predictions, mean and standard deviation. In addition, we describe trends in the model parameters across Urban-type classes. Although they were included as random effects in our predictive model, they will provide the urban research community with quantitative information about the effect of neighborhood age and type on the degree of urban intensification at a national scale.
AB - The geographic distribution of building coverage is an important factor when evaluating the potential for green infrastructure and other sustainable development practices. However, comprehensive building coverage datasets are not available for many urban communities. We predicted the distribution of building coverage ratio across the contiguous United States (CONUS) at the scale of census block group using a bootstrap strategy applied to a nonlinear mixed effects model. Building footprints from 12 metropolitan areas were examined for completeness and aggregated at the level of U.S. census block groups (n = 19,109) and used to train the model. The best predictive model included both the percentage of the impervious surface area and housing unit density as nonlinear fixed effects in the form of a multivariate power function. Urban-type class, defined by median construction year of housing units and land use composition, were included in the model as a random effect. Cross-validation indicated that the selected model has a mean error of 0.049% (95% CI 0.047 and 0.051) of the estimated proportion of block group land area represented by building coverage. Adopting a bootstrapping strategy allowed selection of a subset with a minimum distance between samples to avoid spatial autocorrelation of residuals, while repeating the sampling for 1000 iterations to estimate the confidence intervals of the model parameters. Results are provided as open access data which quantify the geographical distribution of building coverage in terms of the ensemble predictions, mean and standard deviation. In addition, we describe trends in the model parameters across Urban-type classes. Although they were included as random effects in our predictive model, they will provide the urban research community with quantitative information about the effect of neighborhood age and type on the degree of urban intensification at a national scale.
KW - Building coverage ratio
KW - Green infrastructure
KW - NLME
KW - Urban intensification
KW - Urban sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048716905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048716905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048716905
SN - 0198-9715
VL - 71
SP - 199
EP - 208
JO - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
JF - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
ER -