TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the effect of fixed structures on rail stress management
T2 - A numerical investigation
AU - Kosarneshan, Kamyar
AU - Dersch, Marcus S.
AU - Edwards, J. Riley
N1 - This research effort is funded by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), part of the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT). The material in this paper represents the position of the authors and not necessarily that of sponsors. The authors also would like to acknowledge the following project industry partners for supplying insight and recommendations for the broader FRA-funded project: BNSF, Union Pacific Railroad, Amtrak, MxV Rail, and the U.S. DOT Volpe Center; J. Riley Edwards has been supported in part by the grants to the Illinois Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) from CN and Hanson Professional Services. Additional thanks to Dr. Andrew Kish for his consultations and insight into the topic of longitudinal resistance and rail neutral temperature.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - From 2012 to 2021, FRA accident data indicate that there have been 132 derailments caused by track buckles. Out of the 132 total derailments, 59 (or 45 %) occurred within 152 m (500 ft.) of a fixed structure. Therefore, this paper presents, validates, and applies a 3D finite element-based model to study the effect of the fixed structure on the rail gap size given a rail break. Specifically, the model was used to quantify the effect of the: 1) temperature differential between the rail neutral temperature (RNT) and the actual rail temperature (dT), 2) distance of the cut to the fixed structure, and 3) fixed structure length and anchoring patterns (ETA and EOTA). Model results indicated that at low dTs (e.g., <13.9ºC (25ºF)) the effect of the fixed structure can be considered if the cut occurred at the edge of the fixed structure with EOTA anchoring pattern and the fixed structure length of at least 18.3 m (60 ft.). At a dT of 22.2ºC (40ºF), the fixed structure should be accounted for when there is an edge cut. At extreme dTs (e.g., > 44.4ºC (80°F)) the fixed structure should be considered if the cut occurs within 152.3 m (500 ft.). Therefore, it is recommended that railroads refrain from strictly following open track guidelines for CWR (continuous welded rail) management and rather, consider the influence of fixed structures in relevant situations.
AB - From 2012 to 2021, FRA accident data indicate that there have been 132 derailments caused by track buckles. Out of the 132 total derailments, 59 (or 45 %) occurred within 152 m (500 ft.) of a fixed structure. Therefore, this paper presents, validates, and applies a 3D finite element-based model to study the effect of the fixed structure on the rail gap size given a rail break. Specifically, the model was used to quantify the effect of the: 1) temperature differential between the rail neutral temperature (RNT) and the actual rail temperature (dT), 2) distance of the cut to the fixed structure, and 3) fixed structure length and anchoring patterns (ETA and EOTA). Model results indicated that at low dTs (e.g., <13.9ºC (25ºF)) the effect of the fixed structure can be considered if the cut occurred at the edge of the fixed structure with EOTA anchoring pattern and the fixed structure length of at least 18.3 m (60 ft.). At a dT of 22.2ºC (40ºF), the fixed structure should be accounted for when there is an edge cut. At extreme dTs (e.g., > 44.4ºC (80°F)) the fixed structure should be considered if the cut occurs within 152.3 m (500 ft.). Therefore, it is recommended that railroads refrain from strictly following open track guidelines for CWR (continuous welded rail) management and rather, consider the influence of fixed structures in relevant situations.
KW - CWR stress management
KW - Finite element modeling (FEM)
KW - Fixed structures
KW - Longitudinal track resistance
KW - Rail neutral temperature (RNT)
KW - Single rail break (SRB)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199946043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199946043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118662
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118662
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199946043
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 318
JO - Engineering Structures
JF - Engineering Structures
M1 - 118662
ER -