Quantifying the effect of fixed structures on rail stress management: A numerical investigation

Kamyar Kosarneshan, Marcus S. Dersch, J. Riley Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

From 2012 to 2021, FRA accident data indicate that there have been 132 derailments caused by track buckles. Out of the 132 total derailments, 59 (or 45 %) occurred within 152 m (500 ft.) of a fixed structure. Therefore, this paper presents, validates, and applies a 3D finite element-based model to study the effect of the fixed structure on the rail gap size given a rail break. Specifically, the model was used to quantify the effect of the: 1) temperature differential between the rail neutral temperature (RNT) and the actual rail temperature (dT), 2) distance of the cut to the fixed structure, and 3) fixed structure length and anchoring patterns (ETA and EOTA). Model results indicated that at low dTs (e.g., <13.9ºC (25ºF)) the effect of the fixed structure can be considered if the cut occurred at the edge of the fixed structure with EOTA anchoring pattern and the fixed structure length of at least 18.3 m (60 ft.). At a dT of 22.2ºC (40ºF), the fixed structure should be accounted for when there is an edge cut. At extreme dTs (e.g., > 44.4ºC (80°F)) the fixed structure should be considered if the cut occurs within 152.3 m (500 ft.). Therefore, it is recommended that railroads refrain from strictly following open track guidelines for CWR (continuous welded rail) management and rather, consider the influence of fixed structures in relevant situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number118662
JournalEngineering Structures
Volume318
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2024

Keywords

  • CWR stress management
  • Finite element modeling (FEM)
  • Fixed structures
  • Longitudinal track resistance
  • Rail neutral temperature (RNT)
  • Single rail break (SRB)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the effect of fixed structures on rail stress management: A numerical investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this