Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature

Shubhanshu Mishra, Vetle Ingvald Torvik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We introduce several measures of novelty for a scientific article in MEDLINE based on the temporal profiles of its assigned Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). First, temporal profiles for all MeSH terms (and pairs of MeSH terms) were characterized empirically and modelled as logistic growth curves. Second, a paper's novelty is captured by its youngest MeSH (and pairs of MeSH) as measured in years and volume of prior work. Across all papers in MEDLINE published since 1985, we find that individual concept novelty is rare (2.7% of papers have a MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 1.0% have a MeSH ≤ 20 papers old), while combinatorial novelty is the norm (68% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 90% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 10 papers old). Furthermore, these novelty measures exhibit complex correlations with article impact (as measured by citations received) and authors' professional age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalD-Lib Magazine
Volume22
Issue number9-10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

logistics
literature

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • MEDLINE
  • Novelty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature. / Mishra, Shubhanshu; Torvik, Vetle Ingvald.

In: D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 22, No. 9-10, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{646d25b8ab6741b2a049b3827e82539b,
title = "Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature",
abstract = "We introduce several measures of novelty for a scientific article in MEDLINE based on the temporal profiles of its assigned Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). First, temporal profiles for all MeSH terms (and pairs of MeSH terms) were characterized empirically and modelled as logistic growth curves. Second, a paper's novelty is captured by its youngest MeSH (and pairs of MeSH) as measured in years and volume of prior work. Across all papers in MEDLINE published since 1985, we find that individual concept novelty is rare (2.7{\%} of papers have a MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 1.0{\%} have a MeSH ≤ 20 papers old), while combinatorial novelty is the norm (68{\%} have a pair of MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 90{\%} have a pair of MeSH ≤ 10 papers old). Furthermore, these novelty measures exhibit complex correlations with article impact (as measured by citations received) and authors' professional age.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, MEDLINE, Novelty",
author = "Shubhanshu Mishra and Torvik, {Vetle Ingvald}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1045/september2016-mishra",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
journal = "D-Lib Magazine",
issn = "1082-9873",
publisher = "Corporation for National Research Initiatives",
number = "9-10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature

AU - Mishra, Shubhanshu

AU - Torvik, Vetle Ingvald

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - We introduce several measures of novelty for a scientific article in MEDLINE based on the temporal profiles of its assigned Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). First, temporal profiles for all MeSH terms (and pairs of MeSH terms) were characterized empirically and modelled as logistic growth curves. Second, a paper's novelty is captured by its youngest MeSH (and pairs of MeSH) as measured in years and volume of prior work. Across all papers in MEDLINE published since 1985, we find that individual concept novelty is rare (2.7% of papers have a MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 1.0% have a MeSH ≤ 20 papers old), while combinatorial novelty is the norm (68% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 90% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 10 papers old). Furthermore, these novelty measures exhibit complex correlations with article impact (as measured by citations received) and authors' professional age.

AB - We introduce several measures of novelty for a scientific article in MEDLINE based on the temporal profiles of its assigned Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). First, temporal profiles for all MeSH terms (and pairs of MeSH terms) were characterized empirically and modelled as logistic growth curves. Second, a paper's novelty is captured by its youngest MeSH (and pairs of MeSH) as measured in years and volume of prior work. Across all papers in MEDLINE published since 1985, we find that individual concept novelty is rare (2.7% of papers have a MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 1.0% have a MeSH ≤ 20 papers old), while combinatorial novelty is the norm (68% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 90% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 10 papers old). Furthermore, these novelty measures exhibit complex correlations with article impact (as measured by citations received) and authors' professional age.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - MEDLINE

KW - Novelty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992463389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992463389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1045/september2016-mishra

DO - 10.1045/september2016-mishra

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992463389

VL - 22

JO - D-Lib Magazine

JF - D-Lib Magazine

SN - 1082-9873

IS - 9-10

ER -