@article{cfab77231e9f4df5808703605c528873,
title = "Quantification of longitudinal fastener stiffness and the effect on fastening system loading demand",
abstract = "Over the past 20 years, there have been at least 10 derailments due to spike fastener fatigue failures in North America. These fatigue failures have been considered a moderate to severe challenge that require manual walking inspections that are both time and labor intensive. These fatigue failures have been found to result from spike overloading due to lateral and longitudinal loads. To date, there has been limited quantification of the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal fastener forces in track. This paper quantifies the effect of fastener type on fastener load to account for various track types and locations. Laboratory experimentation was performed to quantify the stiffness of multiple fastening systems and this data was input into a previously validated analytical model to quantify the effect of stiffness on fastener loading. Additional laboratory experimentation was performed to quantify the relationships between both fastening system type and vertical loading and spike strain. While the laboratory data indicate a significant variance in stiffness between fastening systems, the model results indicate that the load transferred to the fastening system is less sensitive. However, spike strain data indicate the load path was affected by fastener type and vertical load. The characterization of longitudinal stiffness of multiple fastening systems and the relationship to spike load as presented can be used to advance track mechanistic-empirical design and improve rail neutral temperature prediction and track buckling models.",
keywords = "Fastening systems, anchored, elastic, laboratory, longitudinal load, stiffness, uplift",
author = "Christian Khachaturian and Dersch, {Marcus S.} and Edwards, {J. Riley} and Matheus Trizotto",
note = "The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research effort is funded by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), part of the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) under Grant AF788 DOT FRA 693JJ612C000005. The material in this paper represents the position of the authors and not necessarily that of sponsors. J Riley Edwards has been supported in part by the grants to the Illinois Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) from CN and Hanson Professional Services. Additional thanks to our industry partners: Norfolk Southern, Canadian National, Union Pacific, CSX, BNSF, Lewis Bolt & Nut Company, Vossloh North America, Progress Rail, and Pandrol, which provided information and expertise through the development of this research. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research effort is funded by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), part of the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) under Grant AF788 DOT FRA 693JJ612C000005. The material in this paper represents the position of the authors and not necessarily that of sponsors. J Riley Edwards has been supported in part by the grants to the Illinois Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) from CN and Hanson Professional Services. Additional thanks to our industry partners: Norfolk Southern, Canadian National, Union Pacific, CSX, BNSF, Lewis Bolt & Nut Company, Vossloh North America, Progress Rail, and Pandrol, which provided information and expertise through the development of this research.",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/09544097221112576",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "237",
pages = "347--355",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit",
issn = "0954-4097",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",
}