Abstract
Qualitative approaches to evaluation have recently attained legitimacy. Now it's time to advance their influence. Towards that end, this discussion offers a self-reflective critique of four critical issues in qualitative evaluation: relativism, theory and generalization, warrant and inquiry criteria, and positioning. Refractions from this critique embolden a recentering of qualitative evaluation around its socio-political value dimensions and a concomitant assumption of the rights and responsibilities of scientist citizens. These refractions further challenge the remainder of the evaluation community to do the same.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-289 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Evaluation |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Qualitative evaluation and scientific citizenship: Reflections and refractions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS