TY - JOUR
T1 - Protorheology in practice
T2 - Avoiding misinterpretation
AU - Hossain, Mohammad Tanver
AU - Tiwari, Ramdas
AU - Ewoldt, Randy H.
N1 - We are thankful to the individuals that, knowingly or unknowingly, provided us ideas for how to misunderstand protorheology observations. SEM imaging was carried out in Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities, University of Illinois. This work was supported as part of the Regenerative Energy-Efficient Manufacturing of Thermoset Polymeric Materials (REMAT), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign under Award No. DE-SC0023457.
We are thankful to the individuals that, knowingly or unknowingly, provided us ideas for how to misunderstand protorheology observations. SEM imaging was carried out in part in the Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities, University of Illinois. This work was supported as part of the Regenerative Energy-Efficient Manufacturing of Thermoset Polymeric Materials (REMAT), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign under Award No. DE-SC0023457.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Protorheology is the paradigm that any observed flow or deformation is a chance to infer quantitative rheological properties. While this creates many opportunities for insight, there is significant risk of misunderstanding the physics involved, e.g. misinterpreting a liquid as a solid or mistaking viscous flow time as viscoelastic relaxation time. We describe these and other potential mistakes, use case studies to show how serious the problems can be, and contrast misinterpretations with correct approaches and interpretations. Some issues are especially important with materials involving colloidal particles and flows involving surface tension. Whether the reader is making inference from a tilted vial, time-lapse gravity-driven flow, a bounce test, die swell, or any other protorheology observation, the examples here serve as a guide for avoiding bad data in protorheology.
AB - Protorheology is the paradigm that any observed flow or deformation is a chance to infer quantitative rheological properties. While this creates many opportunities for insight, there is significant risk of misunderstanding the physics involved, e.g. misinterpreting a liquid as a solid or mistaking viscous flow time as viscoelastic relaxation time. We describe these and other potential mistakes, use case studies to show how serious the problems can be, and contrast misinterpretations with correct approaches and interpretations. Some issues are especially important with materials involving colloidal particles and flows involving surface tension. Whether the reader is making inference from a tilted vial, time-lapse gravity-driven flow, a bounce test, die swell, or any other protorheology observation, the examples here serve as a guide for avoiding bad data in protorheology.
KW - Fluid mechanics
KW - Inference
KW - Inverse problems
KW - Protorheology
KW - Rheological phenomena
KW - Rheometry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206238816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85206238816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cocis.2024.101866
DO - 10.1016/j.cocis.2024.101866
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85206238816
SN - 1359-0294
VL - 74
JO - Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science
JF - Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science
M1 - 101866
ER -