TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective associations of regional social media messages with attitudes and actual vaccination
T2 - A big data and survey study of the influenza vaccine in the United States
AU - Chan, Man pui Sally
AU - Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
AU - Albarracin, Dolores
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health under Award Number R01MH114847, the National Institute on Drug Abuse under Award Number DP1 DA048570, and the National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases under Award Number R01AI147487. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We would like to thank the APPC ASK Group for reviewing keywords and hashtags about influenza and flu that are relevant to the study period.
Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health under Award Number R01MH114847, the National Institute on Drug Abuse under Award Number DP1 DA048570, and the National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases under Award Number R01AI147487. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We would like to thank the APPC ASK Group for reviewing keywords and hashtags about influenza and flu that are relevant to the study period.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/9/11
Y1 - 2020/9/11
N2 - Objective: Using longitudinal methods to assess regional associations between social media posts about vaccines and attitudes and actual vaccination against influenza in the US. Methods: Geolocated tweets from U.S. counties (N = 115,330) were analyzed using MALLET LDA (Latent Dirichlet allocation) topic modeling techniques to correlate with prospective individual survey data (N = 3005) about vaccine attitudes, actual vaccination, and real-life discussions about vaccines with family and friends during the 2018–2019 influenza season. Results: Ten topics were common across U.S. counties during the 2018–2019 influenza season. In the overall analyses, two of these topics (i.e., Vaccine Science Matters and Big Pharma) were associated with attitudes and behaviors. The topic concerning vaccine science in November-February was positively correlated with attitudes in February-March, r = 0.09, BF10 = 3. Moreover, among respondents who did not discuss the influenza vaccine with family and friends, the topic about vaccine fraud and children in November-February was negatively correlated with attitudes in February-March and with vaccination in February-March, and April-May (rs = −0.18 to −0.25, BF10 = 4–146). However, this was absent when participants had discussions about the influenza vaccine with family and friends. Discussion: Regional vaccine content correlated with prospective measures of vaccine attitudes and actual vaccination. Conclusions: Social media have demonstrated strong associations with vaccination patterns. When the associations are negative, discussions with family and friends appear to eliminate them. Programs to promote vaccination should encourage real-life conversations about vaccines.
AB - Objective: Using longitudinal methods to assess regional associations between social media posts about vaccines and attitudes and actual vaccination against influenza in the US. Methods: Geolocated tweets from U.S. counties (N = 115,330) were analyzed using MALLET LDA (Latent Dirichlet allocation) topic modeling techniques to correlate with prospective individual survey data (N = 3005) about vaccine attitudes, actual vaccination, and real-life discussions about vaccines with family and friends during the 2018–2019 influenza season. Results: Ten topics were common across U.S. counties during the 2018–2019 influenza season. In the overall analyses, two of these topics (i.e., Vaccine Science Matters and Big Pharma) were associated with attitudes and behaviors. The topic concerning vaccine science in November-February was positively correlated with attitudes in February-March, r = 0.09, BF10 = 3. Moreover, among respondents who did not discuss the influenza vaccine with family and friends, the topic about vaccine fraud and children in November-February was negatively correlated with attitudes in February-March and with vaccination in February-March, and April-May (rs = −0.18 to −0.25, BF10 = 4–146). However, this was absent when participants had discussions about the influenza vaccine with family and friends. Discussion: Regional vaccine content correlated with prospective measures of vaccine attitudes and actual vaccination. Conclusions: Social media have demonstrated strong associations with vaccination patterns. When the associations are negative, discussions with family and friends appear to eliminate them. Programs to promote vaccination should encourage real-life conversations about vaccines.
KW - Discussions with family and friends
KW - Influenza vaccine
KW - Social media
KW - Vaccination
KW - Vaccine attitude
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090249780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090249780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.054
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.054
M3 - Article
C2 - 32792251
AN - SCOPUS:85090249780
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 38
SP - 6236
EP - 6247
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 40
ER -