Prose fiction

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

'It is impossible to say when women began to write fiction', Elaine Showalter mused in 1977, then proposed that a novelistic 'literature of their own' could be traced 'from about 1750 on'. Even as Showalter cautioned against generalizing from the 'covert solidarity' of Victorian women novelists to a long feminine literary tradition, she assumed that women's fiction writing must have begun with the novel. Since 1977, the recovery of early modern women writers has led us all to rewrite our literary histories, but prose fiction still remains the genre of early modern writing in which women's share seems most surprisingly sparse. I would like to recover a fuller sense of early women's participation in fiction writing by offering generous definitions of every term in Showalter's early comment. As recent work has shown, we now count as women writers those who pen in manuscript or anonymously or collaboratively, as well as those who publish in their own names. Writing now includes translation, continuation and imitation as well as original creation. We should also define fiction inclusively, since in this period before the novel coalesced as a genre, the variety of imaginative prose writing exceeded any extant generic vocabulary. These more comprehensive definitions embrace literary strategies and practices that were not unique to women-authored fiction, but were the conditions of production of all early modern fiction. Indeed, women-authored fiction, although statistically rare, was crucial in enlarging the scope of a genre the period considered marginal. Precisely because women had to approach writing fiction with double caution, both gendered and generic, they articulated unusually subtle claims for the artistic, ethical and political seriousness of imaginative prose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing
EditorsLaura Lunger Knoppers
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages272-286
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781139002691
ISBN (Print)9780521885270, 9780521712422
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Publication series

NameCambridge Companions to Literature

Fingerprint

Fiction
Prose Fiction
Prose
Women Writers
Vocabulary
Solidarity
Names
Participation
Novelist
Recovery
Continuation
Manuscripts
Victorian Era
Literary History
Imitation
Literary Tradition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Newcomb, L. H. (2009). Prose fiction. In L. L. Knoppers (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing (pp. 272-286). (Cambridge Companions to Literature). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020

Prose fiction. / Newcomb, Lori Humphrey.

The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing. ed. / Laura Lunger Knoppers. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 272-286 (Cambridge Companions to Literature).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Newcomb, LH 2009, Prose fiction. in LL Knoppers (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing. Cambridge Companions to Literature, Cambridge University Press, pp. 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020
Newcomb LH. Prose fiction. In Knoppers LL, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 272-286. (Cambridge Companions to Literature). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020
Newcomb, Lori Humphrey. / Prose fiction. The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing. editor / Laura Lunger Knoppers. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 272-286 (Cambridge Companions to Literature).
@inbook{a4adce57afe04154ae19eb5952c393e4,
title = "Prose fiction",
abstract = "'It is impossible to say when women began to write fiction', Elaine Showalter mused in 1977, then proposed that a novelistic 'literature of their own' could be traced 'from about 1750 on'. Even as Showalter cautioned against generalizing from the 'covert solidarity' of Victorian women novelists to a long feminine literary tradition, she assumed that women's fiction writing must have begun with the novel. Since 1977, the recovery of early modern women writers has led us all to rewrite our literary histories, but prose fiction still remains the genre of early modern writing in which women's share seems most surprisingly sparse. I would like to recover a fuller sense of early women's participation in fiction writing by offering generous definitions of every term in Showalter's early comment. As recent work has shown, we now count as women writers those who pen in manuscript or anonymously or collaboratively, as well as those who publish in their own names. Writing now includes translation, continuation and imitation as well as original creation. We should also define fiction inclusively, since in this period before the novel coalesced as a genre, the variety of imaginative prose writing exceeded any extant generic vocabulary. These more comprehensive definitions embrace literary strategies and practices that were not unique to women-authored fiction, but were the conditions of production of all early modern fiction. Indeed, women-authored fiction, although statistically rare, was crucial in enlarging the scope of a genre the period considered marginal. Precisely because women had to approach writing fiction with double caution, both gendered and generic, they articulated unusually subtle claims for the artistic, ethical and political seriousness of imaginative prose.",
author = "Newcomb, {Lori Humphrey}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521885270",
series = "Cambridge Companions to Literature",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
pages = "272--286",
editor = "Knoppers, {Laura Lunger}",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Prose fiction

AU - Newcomb, Lori Humphrey

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - 'It is impossible to say when women began to write fiction', Elaine Showalter mused in 1977, then proposed that a novelistic 'literature of their own' could be traced 'from about 1750 on'. Even as Showalter cautioned against generalizing from the 'covert solidarity' of Victorian women novelists to a long feminine literary tradition, she assumed that women's fiction writing must have begun with the novel. Since 1977, the recovery of early modern women writers has led us all to rewrite our literary histories, but prose fiction still remains the genre of early modern writing in which women's share seems most surprisingly sparse. I would like to recover a fuller sense of early women's participation in fiction writing by offering generous definitions of every term in Showalter's early comment. As recent work has shown, we now count as women writers those who pen in manuscript or anonymously or collaboratively, as well as those who publish in their own names. Writing now includes translation, continuation and imitation as well as original creation. We should also define fiction inclusively, since in this period before the novel coalesced as a genre, the variety of imaginative prose writing exceeded any extant generic vocabulary. These more comprehensive definitions embrace literary strategies and practices that were not unique to women-authored fiction, but were the conditions of production of all early modern fiction. Indeed, women-authored fiction, although statistically rare, was crucial in enlarging the scope of a genre the period considered marginal. Precisely because women had to approach writing fiction with double caution, both gendered and generic, they articulated unusually subtle claims for the artistic, ethical and political seriousness of imaginative prose.

AB - 'It is impossible to say when women began to write fiction', Elaine Showalter mused in 1977, then proposed that a novelistic 'literature of their own' could be traced 'from about 1750 on'. Even as Showalter cautioned against generalizing from the 'covert solidarity' of Victorian women novelists to a long feminine literary tradition, she assumed that women's fiction writing must have begun with the novel. Since 1977, the recovery of early modern women writers has led us all to rewrite our literary histories, but prose fiction still remains the genre of early modern writing in which women's share seems most surprisingly sparse. I would like to recover a fuller sense of early women's participation in fiction writing by offering generous definitions of every term in Showalter's early comment. As recent work has shown, we now count as women writers those who pen in manuscript or anonymously or collaboratively, as well as those who publish in their own names. Writing now includes translation, continuation and imitation as well as original creation. We should also define fiction inclusively, since in this period before the novel coalesced as a genre, the variety of imaginative prose writing exceeded any extant generic vocabulary. These more comprehensive definitions embrace literary strategies and practices that were not unique to women-authored fiction, but were the conditions of production of all early modern fiction. Indeed, women-authored fiction, although statistically rare, was crucial in enlarging the scope of a genre the period considered marginal. Precisely because women had to approach writing fiction with double caution, both gendered and generic, they articulated unusually subtle claims for the artistic, ethical and political seriousness of imaginative prose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926130246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926130246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020

DO - 10.1017/CCOL9780521885270.020

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84926130246

SN - 9780521885270

SN - 9780521712422

T3 - Cambridge Companions to Literature

SP - 272

EP - 286

BT - The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing

A2 - Knoppers, Laura Lunger

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -