TY - JOUR
T1 - Propofol-sparing and hemodynamic effects of guaifenesin in sheep
AU - Ashkin, Mitchell R.
AU - Strahl-Heldreth, Danielle E.
AU - Keating, Stephanie CJ
AU - Garrett, Edgar F.
AU - Gutierrez-Nibeyro, Santiago D.
AU - Trenholme, Heather Nicole
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the propofol-sparing and hemodynamic effects of guaifenesin administered for co-induction of anesthesia in sheep. Study design: Prospective, blinded, two-way crossover experimental study. Animals: Thirteen healthy adult female sheep. Methods: Anesthesia was induced without premedication with intravenous (IV) guaifenesin 5% at 100 mg kg–1 (GGE) or an equivalent volume of physiologic saline (SAL), followed by IV propofol at a controlled rate (1 mg kg–1 min–1). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate and oscillometric noninvasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP) were recorded at baseline after co-induction administration, following endotracheal intubation and every 2 minutes thereafter for 10 minutes. Propofol doses required to achieve intubation after each co-induction treatment were compared by independent Student's t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The propofol dose required (mean ± standard deviation) to achieve intubation was significantly lower (p = 0.001) in the GGE treatment (3.40 ± 0.74 mg kg–1) than in the SAL treatment (5.94 ± 1.09 mg kg–1). HR was increased after anesthetic induction compared with baseline in both treatments. HR was generally lower in the GGE treatment than in the SAL treatment. NIBP did not vary between GGE and SAL treatments. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Guaifenesin, when administered as a co-induction agent with propofol in sheep, reduces propofol dose requirements and maintains hemodynamic variables within a clinically acceptable range.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the propofol-sparing and hemodynamic effects of guaifenesin administered for co-induction of anesthesia in sheep. Study design: Prospective, blinded, two-way crossover experimental study. Animals: Thirteen healthy adult female sheep. Methods: Anesthesia was induced without premedication with intravenous (IV) guaifenesin 5% at 100 mg kg–1 (GGE) or an equivalent volume of physiologic saline (SAL), followed by IV propofol at a controlled rate (1 mg kg–1 min–1). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate and oscillometric noninvasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP) were recorded at baseline after co-induction administration, following endotracheal intubation and every 2 minutes thereafter for 10 minutes. Propofol doses required to achieve intubation after each co-induction treatment were compared by independent Student's t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The propofol dose required (mean ± standard deviation) to achieve intubation was significantly lower (p = 0.001) in the GGE treatment (3.40 ± 0.74 mg kg–1) than in the SAL treatment (5.94 ± 1.09 mg kg–1). HR was increased after anesthetic induction compared with baseline in both treatments. HR was generally lower in the GGE treatment than in the SAL treatment. NIBP did not vary between GGE and SAL treatments. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Guaifenesin, when administered as a co-induction agent with propofol in sheep, reduces propofol dose requirements and maintains hemodynamic variables within a clinically acceptable range.
KW - anesthesia
KW - co-induction
KW - guaifenesin
KW - ovine
KW - propofol
KW - sheep
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197580184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85197580184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 38969616
AN - SCOPUS:85197580184
SN - 1467-2987
VL - 51
SP - 515
EP - 519
JO - Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
JF - Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
IS - 5
ER -