Abstract

In 2006, Warnow, Evans, Ringe, and Nakhleh proposed a stochastic model (hereafter, the WERN 2006 model) of multi-state linguistic character evolution that allowed for homoplasy and borrowing. They proved that if there is no borrowing between languages and homoplastic states are known in advance, then the phylogenetic tree of a set of languages is statistically identifiable under this model, and they presented statistically consistent methods for estimating these phylogenetic trees. However, they left open the question of whether a phylogenetic network—which would explicitly model borrowing between languages that are in contact—can be estimated under the model of character evolution. Here, we establish that under some mild additional constraints on the WERN 2006 model, the phylogenetic network topology is statistically identifiable and we present algorithms to infer the phylogenetic network. We discuss the ramifications for linguistic phylogenetic network estimation in practice and suggest directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Method Works
Subtitle of host publicationStudies on Language Change in Honor of Don Ringe
PublisherSpringer
Pages45-62
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9783031489594
ISBN (Print)9783031489587
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Progress on Constructing Phylogenetic Networks for Languages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this