TY - JOUR
T1 - Progradational sand-mud deltas in lakes and reservoirs. Part 2. Experiment and numerical simulation
AU - Kostic, Svetlana
AU - Parker, Gary
N1 - The numerical model of prograding deltas described in the proceeding companion paper (Kostic and Parker, 2003) was tested against two experiments on sand-mud delta progradation. Comparison of the numerical predictions and experimental data illustrates the ability of the numerical model to capture the co-evolution of sandy topset and foreset deposits with muddy bot-tomset deposits. This reasonable agreement was achieved with a minimum of parameter adjustment within the constraints of the data available. The evolution of the foreset-bottomset interface observed in the experiments and successfully simulated in the model is reminiscent of that observed not only in the field-scale simulations of the companion paper, but also that observed in the delta of the Colorado River in Lake Mead (Figure 3b of the companion paper.) The fluvial part of the numerical model proved to be sensitive to the choices of Chezy friction coefficient C- and standing water surface elevation Z/. In the case of standing water surface, this sensitivity was observed in the experiments themselves, where even slight increases and decreases in water surface elevation were found to affect the topset. The turbidity current part of the model was found to be sensitive to the choice of the initial mixing coefficient y. This parameter influenced the rate of aggradation of the bottomset and foreset-bottomset interaction predominantly through its effect on the volumetric concentration of mud immediately after the plunge point. Variation in the mud fall velocity VM proved to have a similar impact on bottomset aggradation. As opposed to uncertainties associated with the choice of the mixing coefficient, the range of realistic fall velocities can be determined relatively correctly. Other parameters that introduce uncertainties in the numerical modeling are: porosity (As, A), the coefficient a in Engelund-Hansen relation and bottomset friction factor cr>. Of these parameters, the most difficult to estimate is cD. The numerical model, however, proved to be relatively insensitive to increases in cD of up to 400%. Generally, because of the time scale associated with fluvial and turbidity current processes, the latter have the most significant impact on the short-term interaction between deposits of the experiments analyzed here. Two ways in which the model can be improved are (a) generalization of the model to multiple grain sizes and (b) generalization to a configuration in which the deltaic topset deposits flare out in the transverse direction (Parker et al., 1998). The authors are presently pursuing the latter generalization. This work is the result of research sponsored by the Minnesota Sea Grant and the Office of Naval Research STRATAFORM program. The Minnesota Sea Grant College Program is supported by the NOAA Office of Sea Grant, United States Department of Commerce, under grant no. NOAA-NA86-RG0033. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for government purposes, not withstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. This paper is journal reprint no. JR489 of the Minnesota Sea Grant College Program.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Rivers deposit deltas wherever they reach standing water, i.e. a lake or reservoir. Here the case of a sand-bed river carrying mud as wash load is considered. In general the sand tends to deposit out to form a fluvial topset and an avalanching foreset, and the mud tends to deposit out as a bottomset. During floods, many sand-bed rivers carry sufficiently high concentrations of washload to render the river water heavier than that of the body of standing water. In such a case the mud-laden river fow plunges to form a bottom turbidity current. In a companion paper a 1-D numerical model of a prograding delta was presented. In this model fluvial, avalanching and turbidity current deposition are all linked in terms of a moving boundary formulation. Here the model is compared against two experiments on delta progradation. The experiments reveal an intriguing interaction between the three elements of the model, with foreset progradation burying the bottomset and pushing its upstream point ever downstream, and with bottomset deposition raising the toe of the foreset, so increasing the rate of foreset progradation as sand is delivered from the topset. The numerical model of the companion paper captures this interaction with a minimum of adjustment of input parameters. The resulting description of delta morphodynamics is very similar to that observed in e.g. the delta in the Colorado River, USA where it reaches Lake Mead.
AB - Rivers deposit deltas wherever they reach standing water, i.e. a lake or reservoir. Here the case of a sand-bed river carrying mud as wash load is considered. In general the sand tends to deposit out to form a fluvial topset and an avalanching foreset, and the mud tends to deposit out as a bottomset. During floods, many sand-bed rivers carry sufficiently high concentrations of washload to render the river water heavier than that of the body of standing water. In such a case the mud-laden river fow plunges to form a bottom turbidity current. In a companion paper a 1-D numerical model of a prograding delta was presented. In this model fluvial, avalanching and turbidity current deposition are all linked in terms of a moving boundary formulation. Here the model is compared against two experiments on delta progradation. The experiments reveal an intriguing interaction between the three elements of the model, with foreset progradation burying the bottomset and pushing its upstream point ever downstream, and with bottomset deposition raising the toe of the foreset, so increasing the rate of foreset progradation as sand is delivered from the topset. The numerical model of the companion paper captures this interaction with a minimum of adjustment of input parameters. The resulting description of delta morphodynamics is very similar to that observed in e.g. the delta in the Colorado River, USA where it reaches Lake Mead.
KW - Bed evolution
KW - Experiments on delta progradation
KW - Fall velocity
KW - Initial mixing coefficient
KW - Numerical simulations
KW - Sand-mud interface
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0038004535
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0038004535#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/00221680309499957
DO - 10.1080/00221680309499957
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0038004535
SN - 0022-1686
VL - 41
SP - 141
EP - 152
JO - Journal of Hydraulic Research
JF - Journal of Hydraulic Research
IS - 2
ER -