Professionalization, Ethics, and Fidelity to an Evaluation Ethos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the terms profession and professional mean, and not considering how processes of professionalization are affected by the incorporation of evaluative activities in systems of managerial control. Most glaring is the absence of vigorous discussion of what professionalism means in evaluation and what the profession itself aims to add to society, or the social good it seeks to serve. In a word, there is little discussion of the professional ethos of evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-553
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

professionalization
Ethics
moral philosophy
evaluation
profession
Credentialing
Fidelity
Evaluation
Professionalization
Ethos
Values

Keywords

  • ethics
  • professionalism
  • professionalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Professionalization, Ethics, and Fidelity to an Evaluation Ethos. / Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 546-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25522978bb4b4df5b49f1f76e25cab81,
title = "Professionalization, Ethics, and Fidelity to an Evaluation Ethos",
abstract = "Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the terms profession and professional mean, and not considering how processes of professionalization are affected by the incorporation of evaluative activities in systems of managerial control. Most glaring is the absence of vigorous discussion of what professionalism means in evaluation and what the profession itself aims to add to society, or the social good it seeks to serve. In a word, there is little discussion of the professional ethos of evaluation.",
keywords = "ethics, professionalism, professionalization",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214017728578",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "546--553",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professionalization, Ethics, and Fidelity to an Evaluation Ethos

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the terms profession and professional mean, and not considering how processes of professionalization are affected by the incorporation of evaluative activities in systems of managerial control. Most glaring is the absence of vigorous discussion of what professionalism means in evaluation and what the profession itself aims to add to society, or the social good it seeks to serve. In a word, there is little discussion of the professional ethos of evaluation.

AB - Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the terms profession and professional mean, and not considering how processes of professionalization are affected by the incorporation of evaluative activities in systems of managerial control. Most glaring is the absence of vigorous discussion of what professionalism means in evaluation and what the profession itself aims to add to society, or the social good it seeks to serve. In a word, there is little discussion of the professional ethos of evaluation.

KW - ethics

KW - professionalism

KW - professionalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034824512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034824512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214017728578

DO - 10.1177/1098214017728578

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034824512

VL - 38

SP - 546

EP - 553

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 4

ER -