Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture

Cameron M. Pittelkow, Xinqiang Liang, Bruce A. Linquist, Lees Jan Van Groenigen, Juhwan Lee, Mark E. Lundy, Natasja Van Gestel, Johan Six, Rodney T. Venterea, Chris Van Kessel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One of the primary challenges of our time is to feed a growing and more demandingworld population with reduced external inputs and minimal environmental impacts, allundermore variable and extreme climate conditions in the future1-4. Conservation agriculture represents a set of three crop management principles that has received strong international support to help address this challenge5,6, with recent conservation agriculture efforts focusing on smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia7.However, conservationagriculture is highly debated, with respect to both its effects on crop yields8-10 andits applicability in different farming contexts7,11-13. Here weconduct a globalmeta-analysis using 5,463 paired yield observations from610 studies to compare no-till, the original and central concept of conservation agriculture, with conventional tillage practices across 48 crops and 63 countries. Overall, our results show that no-till reduces yields, yet this response is variable and under certain conditions no-till can produce equivalent or greater yields than conventional tillage. Importantly,whenno-till is combined with the other two conservation agriculture principles of residue retention and crop rotation, its negative impacts are minimized. Moreover, no-till in combination with the other two principles significantly increases rainfed cropproductivity indry climates, suggesting that itmaybecome animportant climate-change adaptation strategy for ever-drier regions of the world. However, any expansion of conservation agriculture should be done with caution in these areas, as implementation of the other two principles is often challenging in resource-poor and vulnerable smallholder farming systems, thereby increasing the likelihood of yield losses rather than gains. Although farming systems are multifunctional, and environmental and socio-economic factors need to be considered14-16, our analysis indicates that the potential contribution of no-till to the sustainable intensification of agriculture is more limited than often assumed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-368
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume517
Issue number7534
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2015

Fingerprint

Agriculture
Climate
Africa South of the Sahara
Climate Change
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., Van Groenigen, L. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., ... Van Kessel, C. (2015). Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 517(7534), 365-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13809

Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. / Pittelkow, Cameron M.; Liang, Xinqiang; Linquist, Bruce A.; Van Groenigen, Lees Jan; Lee, Juhwan; Lundy, Mark E.; Van Gestel, Natasja; Six, Johan; Venterea, Rodney T.; Van Kessel, Chris.

In: Nature, Vol. 517, No. 7534, 15.01.2015, p. 365-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pittelkow, CM, Liang, X, Linquist, BA, Van Groenigen, LJ, Lee, J, Lundy, ME, Van Gestel, N, Six, J, Venterea, RT & Van Kessel, C 2015, 'Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture', Nature, vol. 517, no. 7534, pp. 365-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13809
Pittelkow CM, Liang X, Linquist BA, Van Groenigen LJ, Lee J, Lundy ME et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature. 2015 Jan 15;517(7534):365-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13809
Pittelkow, Cameron M. ; Liang, Xinqiang ; Linquist, Bruce A. ; Van Groenigen, Lees Jan ; Lee, Juhwan ; Lundy, Mark E. ; Van Gestel, Natasja ; Six, Johan ; Venterea, Rodney T. ; Van Kessel, Chris. / Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. In: Nature. 2015 ; Vol. 517, No. 7534. pp. 365-368.
@article{fa92a2410df54da39daed6bd3e1749a1,
title = "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture",
abstract = "One of the primary challenges of our time is to feed a growing and more demandingworld population with reduced external inputs and minimal environmental impacts, allundermore variable and extreme climate conditions in the future1-4. Conservation agriculture represents a set of three crop management principles that has received strong international support to help address this challenge5,6, with recent conservation agriculture efforts focusing on smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia7.However, conservationagriculture is highly debated, with respect to both its effects on crop yields8-10 andits applicability in different farming contexts7,11-13. Here weconduct a globalmeta-analysis using 5,463 paired yield observations from610 studies to compare no-till, the original and central concept of conservation agriculture, with conventional tillage practices across 48 crops and 63 countries. Overall, our results show that no-till reduces yields, yet this response is variable and under certain conditions no-till can produce equivalent or greater yields than conventional tillage. Importantly,whenno-till is combined with the other two conservation agriculture principles of residue retention and crop rotation, its negative impacts are minimized. Moreover, no-till in combination with the other two principles significantly increases rainfed cropproductivity indry climates, suggesting that itmaybecome animportant climate-change adaptation strategy for ever-drier regions of the world. However, any expansion of conservation agriculture should be done with caution in these areas, as implementation of the other two principles is often challenging in resource-poor and vulnerable smallholder farming systems, thereby increasing the likelihood of yield losses rather than gains. Although farming systems are multifunctional, and environmental and socio-economic factors need to be considered14-16, our analysis indicates that the potential contribution of no-till to the sustainable intensification of agriculture is more limited than often assumed.",
author = "Pittelkow, {Cameron M.} and Xinqiang Liang and Linquist, {Bruce A.} and {Van Groenigen}, {Lees Jan} and Juhwan Lee and Lundy, {Mark E.} and {Van Gestel}, Natasja and Johan Six and Venterea, {Rodney T.} and {Van Kessel}, Chris",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1038/nature13809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "517",
pages = "365--368",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7534",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture

AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M.

AU - Liang, Xinqiang

AU - Linquist, Bruce A.

AU - Van Groenigen, Lees Jan

AU - Lee, Juhwan

AU - Lundy, Mark E.

AU - Van Gestel, Natasja

AU - Six, Johan

AU - Venterea, Rodney T.

AU - Van Kessel, Chris

PY - 2015/1/15

Y1 - 2015/1/15

N2 - One of the primary challenges of our time is to feed a growing and more demandingworld population with reduced external inputs and minimal environmental impacts, allundermore variable and extreme climate conditions in the future1-4. Conservation agriculture represents a set of three crop management principles that has received strong international support to help address this challenge5,6, with recent conservation agriculture efforts focusing on smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia7.However, conservationagriculture is highly debated, with respect to both its effects on crop yields8-10 andits applicability in different farming contexts7,11-13. Here weconduct a globalmeta-analysis using 5,463 paired yield observations from610 studies to compare no-till, the original and central concept of conservation agriculture, with conventional tillage practices across 48 crops and 63 countries. Overall, our results show that no-till reduces yields, yet this response is variable and under certain conditions no-till can produce equivalent or greater yields than conventional tillage. Importantly,whenno-till is combined with the other two conservation agriculture principles of residue retention and crop rotation, its negative impacts are minimized. Moreover, no-till in combination with the other two principles significantly increases rainfed cropproductivity indry climates, suggesting that itmaybecome animportant climate-change adaptation strategy for ever-drier regions of the world. However, any expansion of conservation agriculture should be done with caution in these areas, as implementation of the other two principles is often challenging in resource-poor and vulnerable smallholder farming systems, thereby increasing the likelihood of yield losses rather than gains. Although farming systems are multifunctional, and environmental and socio-economic factors need to be considered14-16, our analysis indicates that the potential contribution of no-till to the sustainable intensification of agriculture is more limited than often assumed.

AB - One of the primary challenges of our time is to feed a growing and more demandingworld population with reduced external inputs and minimal environmental impacts, allundermore variable and extreme climate conditions in the future1-4. Conservation agriculture represents a set of three crop management principles that has received strong international support to help address this challenge5,6, with recent conservation agriculture efforts focusing on smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia7.However, conservationagriculture is highly debated, with respect to both its effects on crop yields8-10 andits applicability in different farming contexts7,11-13. Here weconduct a globalmeta-analysis using 5,463 paired yield observations from610 studies to compare no-till, the original and central concept of conservation agriculture, with conventional tillage practices across 48 crops and 63 countries. Overall, our results show that no-till reduces yields, yet this response is variable and under certain conditions no-till can produce equivalent or greater yields than conventional tillage. Importantly,whenno-till is combined with the other two conservation agriculture principles of residue retention and crop rotation, its negative impacts are minimized. Moreover, no-till in combination with the other two principles significantly increases rainfed cropproductivity indry climates, suggesting that itmaybecome animportant climate-change adaptation strategy for ever-drier regions of the world. However, any expansion of conservation agriculture should be done with caution in these areas, as implementation of the other two principles is often challenging in resource-poor and vulnerable smallholder farming systems, thereby increasing the likelihood of yield losses rather than gains. Although farming systems are multifunctional, and environmental and socio-economic factors need to be considered14-16, our analysis indicates that the potential contribution of no-till to the sustainable intensification of agriculture is more limited than often assumed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922663710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922663710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nature13809

DO - 10.1038/nature13809

M3 - Article

C2 - 25337882

AN - SCOPUS:84922663710

VL - 517

SP - 365

EP - 368

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 7534

ER -