Abstract
History has shown that the scholarly and regulatory focus on board composition and structure is a dangerously incomplete solution to the problems that have caused recent corporate failures. The media and corporate scholars have assigned much of the blame for the 2008 financial crisis and the Enron-era corporate scandals to corporate boards. The conventional diagnosis of these ills is that boards were largely at fault because they failed to effectively monitor corporate officers. Unfortunately the conventional diagnosis of the problem is incomplete and the policy prescriptions flowing from this faulty diagnosis are unlikely to address the very real problems that continue to plague corporate governance.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-313 |
Number of pages | 53 |
Journal | Southern California Law Review |
Volume | 85 |
Issue number | 2 |
State | Published - Jan 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law