TY - JOUR
T1 - Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment
T2 - Downward approach to hydrological model development
AU - Jothityangkoon, C.
AU - Sivapalan, M.
AU - Farmer, D. L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was financially supported by the Royal Thai Government scholarship awarded to the first author. The work was also partially supported by an ARC Small Grant awarded to the second author through the University of Western Australia. We thank the two reviewers G. Blöschl and D. Post for their constructive comments which helped to substantially improve the paper. CWR Reference ED 1553 CJ.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001/12/10
Y1 - 2001/12/10
N2 - The process controls on water balance are examined at the annual, monthly and daily scales. A systematic 'downward' approach for the formulation of models of appropriate complexity is presented based on an investigation of the climate, soil and vegetation controls on water balance. Starting with a simple model, complexity is added in steps, with the models tested progressively against signatures of runoff variability at each time scale. The inter-annual variability of runoff is the first signature considered, followed by the intra-annual (mean monthly) variation of runoff. The flow duration curve is the third key signature and is used to test predictions of the daily water balance model. These analyses are carried out using observed data from the Collie River Basin in Western Australia. At the annual time scale, a simple water balance model including saturation excess overland flow and evaporation is found adequate, provided spatial variability of soil depths and rainfall are introduced through multiple buckets. At the monthly time scale, additional processes are required - the key process is subsurface runoff, but in our case we also separated total evapotranspiration into bare soil evaporation and transpiration to represent the heterogeneous vegetation cover. At the daily time scale, inclusion of non-linearity in the storage-discharge relationship for subsurface runoff generation was important, and more crucially, the inclusion of a deeper groundwater store to capture prolonged low flows was important. Model predictions were very sensitive to the assumed distribution of soil depths, both within each subcatchment, and between subcatchments on a regional basis. Streamflow routing was important for large catchments to capture high flows. The overall conclusion is that in this semi-arid catchment, spatial variability of soil depths appear to be the most important control on runoff variability at all time and space scales, followed by the spatial variability of climate and vegetation cover.
AB - The process controls on water balance are examined at the annual, monthly and daily scales. A systematic 'downward' approach for the formulation of models of appropriate complexity is presented based on an investigation of the climate, soil and vegetation controls on water balance. Starting with a simple model, complexity is added in steps, with the models tested progressively against signatures of runoff variability at each time scale. The inter-annual variability of runoff is the first signature considered, followed by the intra-annual (mean monthly) variation of runoff. The flow duration curve is the third key signature and is used to test predictions of the daily water balance model. These analyses are carried out using observed data from the Collie River Basin in Western Australia. At the annual time scale, a simple water balance model including saturation excess overland flow and evaporation is found adequate, provided spatial variability of soil depths and rainfall are introduced through multiple buckets. At the monthly time scale, additional processes are required - the key process is subsurface runoff, but in our case we also separated total evapotranspiration into bare soil evaporation and transpiration to represent the heterogeneous vegetation cover. At the daily time scale, inclusion of non-linearity in the storage-discharge relationship for subsurface runoff generation was important, and more crucially, the inclusion of a deeper groundwater store to capture prolonged low flows was important. Model predictions were very sensitive to the assumed distribution of soil depths, both within each subcatchment, and between subcatchments on a regional basis. Streamflow routing was important for large catchments to capture high flows. The overall conclusion is that in this semi-arid catchment, spatial variability of soil depths appear to be the most important control on runoff variability at all time and space scales, followed by the spatial variability of climate and vegetation cover.
KW - Distributed storage
KW - Downward approach
KW - Process controls
KW - Spatial variability
KW - Water balance
KW - Water yields
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035842461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035842461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00496-6
DO - 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00496-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035842461
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 254
SP - 174
EP - 198
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
IS - 1-4
ER -